{"id":"DUT-MD-018","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Maryland (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)","state":"MD","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.)","authority":"28 U.S.C. § 1331; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)","instrument":"Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 71 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2020) (granting the motion to dismiss the amended complaint)","title":"Antietam Battlefield KOA, et al. v. Lawrence J. Hogan, et al., Memorandum (Civil Action No. CCB-20-1130)","dateIssued":"2020-11-18","effective":"2020-11-18","end":"final in the district court","startDate":"2020-11-18","endDate":"2020-12-31","quarters":["2020Q4"],"types":["STAY","CLOSE","GATH","MASK","DUTY"],"addressees":["the plaintiffs and, as precedent, every business and person subject to the Governor\u0027s orders"],"clause":"Jacobson holds that it is not the role of the judiciary to second-guess policy choices... the court cannot conclude that Governor Hogan\u0027s measures are arbitrary or unreasonable, or that they plainly violate any of the plaintiffs\u0027 constitutional rights.... Accordingly, the defendants\u0027 motion to dismiss will be granted.","enforcement":"Not applicable (judicial opinion)","functions":[],"notes":"Dismissed the constitutional challenge to the Governor\u0027s series of COVID-19 executive orders, confirming as of the fourth quarter of 2020 that the closure, gathering, distancing and face-covering orders stood as valid exercises of the State\u0027s police power binding every addressee. Character as recorded: adjudication (order_operating_condition layer).","sourceUrl":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-mdd-1_20-cv-01130/pdf/USCOURTS-mdd-1_20-cv-01130-1.pdf","snapshot":"","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":210748,"grade":"primary","character":"adjudication","description":"","collection":"DUT-MD","url":"/library/DUT-MD-018","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-MD-018","citation":"United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.), Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 71 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2020) (granting the motion to dismiss the amended complaint) (Ex. DUT-MD-018)","stateName":"Maryland","related":["DUT-MD-017"]}