{"id":"LAW-010","kind":"law","level":"law","jurisdiction":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"Supreme Court of the United States","authority":"Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 (1992)","instrument":"Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 (1992)","title":"Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 (1992)","dateIssued":"1992-03-09","effective":"","end":"","startDate":"1992-03-09","endDate":"","quarters":[],"types":[],"addressees":[],"clause":"We have stated time and again that courts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there.... When the words of a statute are unambiguous, then, this first canon is also the last: \u0022judicial inquiry is complete.\u0022 (Germain, 503 U.S. at 253-54). \u0022When we find the terms of a statute unambiguous, judicial inquiry is complete, except \u0027in rare and exceptional circumstances.\u0027\u0022 (Rubin, 449 U.S. at 430)","enforcement":"","functions":[],"notes":"Tri-State applies Germain at 16 (refusing to \u0027adopt additional requirements not provided for in the statute\u0027) and at 17-18 (the meaning of \u0027due to\u0027 is plain; \u0027judicial inquiry is complete\u0027).","sourceUrl":"https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep503/usrep503249/usrep503249.pdf","snapshot":"","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":236802,"grade":"primary","character":"case","description":"","collection":"LEG-A","url":"/library/LAW-010","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/LAW-010","citation":"Supreme Court of the United States, Connecticut National Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 (1992) (Mar. 9, 1992) (Ex. LAW-010)","stateName":"","related":[]}