{"id":"LAW-013","kind":"law","level":"law","jurisdiction":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"Supreme Court of the United States","authority":"EEOC v. Abercrombie \u0026 Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. 768 (2015)","instrument":"EEOC v. Abercrombie \u0026 Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. 768 (2015)","title":"EEOC v. Abercrombie \u0026 Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. 768 (2015)","dateIssued":"2015-06-01","effective":"","end":"","startDate":"2015-06-01","endDate":"","quarters":[],"types":[],"addressees":[],"clause":"The problem with this approach is the one that inheres in most incorrect interpretations of statutes: It asks us to add words to the law to produce what is thought to be a desirable result. That is Congress\u0027s province.","enforcement":"","functions":[],"notes":"Tri-State at 19 applies Abercrombie to the United States\u0027 \u0027proximate, independent and sufficient cause\u0027 formulation: \u0027Defendant\u0027s interpretation improperly adds words into the statute.\u0027","sourceUrl":"https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep575/usrep575768/usrep575768.pdf","snapshot":"","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":251149,"grade":"primary","character":"case","description":"","collection":"LEG-A","url":"/library/LAW-013","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/LAW-013","citation":"Supreme Court of the United States, EEOC v. Abercrombie \u0026 Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. 768 (2015) (June 1, 2015) (Ex. LAW-013)","stateName":"","related":[]}