{"id":"LAW-016","kind":"law","level":"law","jurisdiction":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","eco":"","issuer":"Supreme Court of the United States","authority":"Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 U.S. 167 (2009)","instrument":"Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 U.S. 167 (2009)","title":"Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 U.S. 167 (2009)","dateIssued":"2009-06-18","effective":"","end":"","startDate":"2009-06-18","endDate":"","quarters":[],"types":[],"addressees":[],"clause":"To establish a disparate-treatment claim under the plain language of the ADEA, therefore, a plaintiff must prove that age was the \u0022but-for\u0022 cause of the employer\u0027s adverse decision.... \u0022[i]n common talk, the phrase \u0027based on\u0027 indicates a but-for causal relationship and thus a necessary logical condition\u0022 and... the statutory phrase, \u0022based on,\u0022 has the same meaning as the phrase, \u0022because of\u0022","enforcement":"","functions":[],"notes":"","sourceUrl":"https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep557/usrep557167/usrep557167.pdf","snapshot":"","fileExists":true,"fileBytes":200534,"grade":"primary","character":"case","description":"","collection":"LEG-A","url":"/library/LAW-016","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/LAW-016","citation":"Supreme Court of the United States, Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., 557 U.S. 167 (2009) (June 18, 2009) (Ex. LAW-016)","stateName":"","related":[]}