{"total":1,"page":1,"pageSize":25,"pages":1,"millis":0,"query":{"q":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","kind":"duty","level":"court","type":"","quarter":"","grade":"","collection":"DUT-SC","from":"","to":"","sort":"relevance"},"items":[{"id":"DUT-SC-020","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"South Carolina","state":"SC","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-SC","issuer":"Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina)","instrument":"Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)","title":"Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se from violation of a protective statute","dateIssued":"1991-10-14","startDate":"1991-10-14","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-SC-020","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-SC-020"}],"facets":{"kind":[{"value":"duty","label":"Standing duty","count":1}],"level":[{"value":"court","label":"Court","count":1}],"state":[{"value":"SC","label":"South Carolina","count":1}],"type":[{"value":"DUTY","label":"Standing duty","count":1},{"value":"OTHER","label":"Other","count":1}],"quarter":[{"value":"2020Q2","label":"2020 Q2","count":1},{"value":"2020Q3","label":"2020 Q3","count":1},{"value":"2020Q4","label":"2020 Q4","count":1},{"value":"2021Q1","label":"2021 Q1","count":1},{"value":"2021Q2","label":"2021 Q2","count":1},{"value":"2021Q3","label":"2021 Q3","count":1}],"grade":[{"value":"primary","label":"Primary source read","count":1}],"industry":[],"agency":[]}}