{"total":28,"page":1,"pageSize":25,"pages":2,"millis":0,"query":{"q":"","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","kind":"duty","level":"court","type":"","quarter":"2020Q4","grade":"","collection":"","from":"","to":"","sort":"relevance"},"items":[{"id":"DUT-OR-019","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Oregon","state":"OR","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-OR","issuer":"Supreme Court of Oregon","instrument":"Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and \u0027may\u0027 be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care)","title":"Shahtout, Petitioner on Review, v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. et al, Respondents on Review","dateIssued":"1985-02-12","startDate":"1985-02-12","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-OR-019","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-OR-019"},{"id":"DUT-OH-017","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Ohio","state":"OH","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-OH","issuer":"Supreme Court of Ohio (per curiam; No. 86-1793)","instrument":"Court decision","title":"Eicher v. United States Steel Corp., 32 Ohio St.3d 248 (1987) (decided September 2, 1987)","dateIssued":"1987-09-02","startDate":"1987-09-02","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-OH-017","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-OH-017"},{"id":"DUT-SC-020","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"South Carolina","state":"SC","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-SC","issuer":"Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina)","instrument":"Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)","title":"Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se from violation of a protective statute","dateIssued":"1991-10-14","startDate":"1991-10-14","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-SC-020","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-SC-020"},{"id":"DUT-MS-013","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Mississippi","state":"MS","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-MS","issuer":"Supreme Court of Mississippi (Smith, P.J., for the Court)","instrument":"Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Travis, 808 So. 2d 928 (Miss. 2002), No. 2000-IA-01074-SCT (Feb. 28, 2002)","title":"Employer\u0027s \u0027non-delegable duty to provide a reasonably safe place to work\u0027 (claims of ninety-nine employees arising from the employer\u0027s policy of not warning or protecting its workers from a workplace hazard held properly joined)","dateIssued":"2002-02-28","startDate":"2002-02-28","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-MS-013","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-MS-013"},{"id":"DUT-MS-014","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Mississippi","state":"MS","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-MS","issuer":"Supreme Court of Mississippi","instrument":"Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. Armond, 866 So. 2d 1092 (Miss. 2004), No. 2003-IA-00398-SCT (Feb. 19, 2004)","title":"The Supreme Court\u0027s statement of its Travis holding: all the employees\u0027 claims \u0027arose out of ICR\u0027s policy of not warning or protecting its workers from the hazards of asbestos exposure, and breaching its non-delegable duty to provide a reasonably safe place to work\u0027","dateIssued":"2004-02-19","startDate":"2004-02-19","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-MS-014","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-MS-014"},{"id":"DUT-MO-010","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Missouri","state":"MO","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-MO","issuer":"Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc (Breckenridge, C.J.; Stith, Draper and Russell, JJ., concurring; Fischer, J., concurring in result; Wilson and Teitelman, JJ., in separate opinions)","instrument":"Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., 489 S.W.3d 784 (Mo. banc 2016), No. SC94442, opinion issued June 7, 2016","title":"Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick Terrio","dateIssued":"2016-06-07","startDate":"2016-06-07","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-MO-010","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-MO-010"},{"id":"DUT-TX-021","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Texas (United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit)","state":"TX","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-TX","issuer":"United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Duncan, J., joined by Elrod, J.; Dennis, J., dissenting)","instrument":"In re Abbott, No. 20-50264 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2020) (published), 954 F.3d 772","title":"In re Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, et al. (petition for writ of mandamus; GA-09)","dateIssued":"2020-04-07","startDate":"2020-04-07","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["HC","DUTY","EMER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-TX-021","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-TX-021"},{"id":"DUT-KS-020","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Kansas","state":"KS","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-KS","issuer":"Supreme Court of Kansas (per curiam)","instrument":"Kelly v. Legislative Coordinating Council, No. 122,765 (Kan. Apr. 11, 2020) (original action in quo warranto; quo warranto granted in part)","title":"Laura Kelly, Governor of the State of Kansas, v. Legislative Coordinating Council, et al.","dateIssued":"2020-04-11","startDate":"2020-04-11","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","GATH","EVT","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-KS-020","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-KS-020"},{"id":"DUT-PA-020","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Pennsylvania","state":"PA","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-PA","issuer":"Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Donohue, J., for the Court; Saylor, C.J., Baer, Todd, Dougherty, Wecht and Mundy, JJ.)","instrument":"Judicial opinion (majority opinion on an emergency application for extraordinary relief)","title":"Friends of Danny DeVito, Kathy Gregory, B\u0026J Laundry, LLC, Blueberry Hill Public Golf Course \u0026 Lounge, and Caledonia Land Co. v. Governor Tom Wolf and Secretary of Health Dr. Rachel Levine, No. 68 MM 2020","dateIssued":"2020-04-13","startDate":"2020-04-13","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["CLOSE","STAY","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-PA-020","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-PA-020"},{"id":"DUT-ME-013","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"United States District Court for the District of Maine","state":"ME","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-ME","issuer":"Hon. Nancy Torresen, U.S. District Judge","instrument":"Order on Plaintiff\u0027s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. Mills, No. 1:20-cv-00156-NT, ECF No. 27 (D. Me. May 9, 2020), reported at 459 F. Supp. 3d 273","title":"Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. Mills: order refusing a temporary restraining order against the ten-person gathering limit as applied to worship","dateIssued":"2020-05-09","startDate":"2020-05-09","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["GATH","EVT","CLOSE","STAY"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-ME-013","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-ME-013"},{"id":"DUT-CT-007","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Connecticut (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut)","state":"CT","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-CT","issuer":"United States District Court, D. Conn. (Shea, J.)","instrument":"Amato v. Elicker, No. 3:20-cv-464 (MPS), ECF No. 32, Ruling on Plaintiffs\u0027 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (D. Conn. May 19, 2020), reported at 460 F. Supp. 3d 202","title":"Amato v. Elicker: ruling denying a New Haven restaurant\u0027s motion to enjoin Executive Orders 7, 7D, 7G and 7N","dateIssued":"2020-05-19","startDate":"2020-05-19","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["GATH","CLOSE","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-CT-007","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-CT-007"},{"id":"DUT-ME-011","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"United States District Court for the District of Maine","state":"ME","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-ME","issuer":"Hon. Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge","instrument":"Order on Plaintiffs\u0027 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Bayley\u0027s Campground, Inc. v. Mills, No. 2:20-cv-00176-LEW, ECF No. 20 (D. Me. May 29, 2020), reported at 463 F. Supp. 3d 22","title":"Bayley\u0027s Campground, Inc. v. Mills: order refusing preliminary injunction against the 14-day self-quarantine requirement of Executive Order 34 FY 19/20","dateIssued":"2020-05-29","startDate":"2020-05-29","endDate":"2021-01-14","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["TRAV","QUAR","COND"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-ME-011","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-ME-011"},{"id":"DUT-NM-014","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"New Mexico (federal district court)","state":"NM","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-NM","issuer":"United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (Browning, J.)","instrument":"Legacy Church, Inc. v. Kunkel, No. CIV 20-0327 JB/SCY, Memorandum Opinion and Order, Doc. 80 (D.N.M. July 13, 2020)","title":"Memorandum opinion denying a preliminary injunction against the Secretary of Health\u0027s public health orders and holding the orders neutral and generally applicable","dateIssued":"2020-07-13","startDate":"2020-07-13","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["GATH","EVT","CLOSE"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-NM-014","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-NM-014"},{"id":"DUT-ME-014","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"United States District Court for the District of Maine","state":"ME","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-ME","issuer":"Hon. Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge","instrument":"Order on Defendant\u0027s Motion to Dismiss, Savage v. Mills, No. 1:20-cv-00165-LEW, ECF No. 26 (D. Me. Aug. 7, 2020), reported at 478 F. Supp. 3d 16","title":"Savage v. Mills (Sunday River Brewing Company): order dismissing business owners\u0027 constitutional challenge to the Governor\u0027s COVID-19 executive orders","dateIssued":"2020-08-07","startDate":"2020-08-07","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["CLOSE","CAP","COND","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-ME-014","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-ME-014"},{"id":"DUT-DC-013","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"District of Columbia","state":"DC","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-DC","issuer":"United States District Court for the District of Columbia (McFadden, J.)","instrument":"Capitol Hill Baptist Church v. Bowser, No. 1:20-cv-02710 (TNM), Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 43 (D.D.C. Oct. 9, 2020), 496 F. Supp. 3d 284","title":"Memorandum Opinion granting a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the District\u0027s gathering restrictions as applied to the Church\u0027s outdoor worship","dateIssued":"2020-10-09","startDate":"2020-10-09","endDate":"2020-12-31","quarters":["2020Q4"],"types":["GATH","EVT","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-DC-013","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-DC-013"},{"id":"DUT-NY-019","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"New York (United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York)","state":"NY","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-NY","issuer":"Hon. Brian M. Cogan, U.S.D.J.","instrument":"Columbus Ale House, Inc. v. Cuomo, No. 1:20-cv-04291-BMC, Doc. 20 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2020) (memorandum decision and order denying preliminary injunction against the midnight closing rule for New York City food service establishments)","title":"Memorandum Decision and Order, Columbus Ale House, Inc. d/b/a The Graham v. Andrew M. Cuomo","dateIssued":"2020-10-16","startDate":"2020-10-16","endDate":"2020-12-31","quarters":["2020Q4"],"types":["CURF","ALC","CAP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-NY-019","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-NY-019"},{"id":"DUT-NM-012","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"New Mexico","state":"NM","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-NM","issuer":"Supreme Court of New Mexico (Vigil, J., for a unanimous Court)","instrument":"Grisham v. Reeb, 2021-NMSC-006, 480 P.3d 852, No. S-1-SC-38336 (N.M. Nov. 5, 2020)","title":"Opinion holding that the Legislature empowered the Governor and Secretary of Health to enforce public health emergency orders restricting business operations through the $5,000 civil administrative penalty of Section 12-10A-19","dateIssued":"2020-11-05","startDate":"2020-11-05","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","CLOSE","GATH"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-NM-012","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-NM-012"},{"id":"DUT-IL-010","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Illinois (Appellate Court, Second District)","state":"IL","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-IL","issuer":"Illinois Appellate Court, Second District (Justice Zenoff, with Justices Hutchinson and Brennan)","instrument":"Fox Fire Tavern, LLC v. Pritzker, 2020 IL App (2d) 200623","title":"Reversal of a temporary restraining order against Executive Order 2020-61; the IEMA Act plainly authorizes successive disaster proclamations; the regional order prescribed guidelines restaurants must follow to operate and was not a closure or quarantine order under the DPH Act","dateIssued":"2020-11-13","startDate":"2020-11-13","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["CLOSE","ALC","CAP","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-IL-010","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-IL-010"},{"id":"DUT-MD-018","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Maryland (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)","state":"MD","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-MD","issuer":"United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.)","instrument":"Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 71 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2020) (granting the motion to dismiss the amended complaint)","title":"Antietam Battlefield KOA, et al. v. Lawrence J. Hogan, et al., Memorandum (Civil Action No. CCB-20-1130)","dateIssued":"2020-11-18","startDate":"2020-11-18","endDate":"2020-12-31","quarters":["2020Q4"],"types":["STAY","CLOSE","GATH","MASK","DUTY"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-MD-018","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-MD-018"},{"id":"DUT-MA-020","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Massachusetts","state":"MA","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-MA","issuer":"Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (Lenk, Gaziano, Lowy, Budd, Cypher, Kafker, JJ.; opinion by Budd, J.)","instrument":"Desrosiers v. Governor, 486 Mass. 369, SJC-12983 (argued Sept. 11, 2020; decided Dec. 10, 2020)","title":"Decision holding that the Civil Defense Act authorized the Governor\u0027s March 10, 2020 declaration and the COVID-19 emergency orders, that the Public Health Act does not displace the Act, and that the orders and their penalties are constitutional","dateIssued":"2020-12-10","startDate":"2020-12-10","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","CLOSE","GATH","EMER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-MA-020","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-MA-020"},{"id":"DUT-IN-009","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Indiana (United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, applying Indiana law)","state":"IN","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-IN","issuer":"Chief Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson, U.S. District Court, S.D. Ind.","instrument":"Order on Motion to Remand and Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, Bar Indy LLC v. City of Indianapolis, No. 1:20-cv-02482-JMS-DML, Doc. 33 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 22, 2020) (43 pages)","title":"Federal decision holding that the Marion County health officer acted within the authority of Ind. Code 16-20-1-24 in closing and restricting bars, nightclubs and restaurants by Public Health Orders 22-2020 through 38-2020, and denying the businesses\u0027 preliminary injunction","dateIssued":"2020-12-22","startDate":"2020-12-22","endDate":"2020-12-31","quarters":["2020Q4"],"types":["CLOSE","CURF","ALC","GATH","CAP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-IN-009","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-IN-009"},{"id":"DUT-MN-017","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Minnesota (Dakota County, First Judicial District)","state":"MN","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-MN","issuer":"Minnesota District Court, First Judicial District, Dakota County (Hon. Jerome B. Abrams)","instrument":"State of Minnesota v. Alibi Drinkery, LLC, No. 19HA-CV-20-4167, Temporary Injunction with incorporated memorandum (filed Dec. 31, 2020)","title":"Temporary Injunction: State\u0027s request granted; Defendant\u0027s request to dissolve the temporary restraining order denied; Executive Order 20-99 lawful under the Emergency Management Act; equal-protection and takings defenses rejected","dateIssued":"2020-12-31","startDate":"2020-12-31","endDate":"2021-01-11","quarters":["2020Q4","2021Q1"],"types":["CLOSE","CAP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-MN-017","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-MN-017"},{"id":"DUT-CT-011","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Connecticut (Supreme Court of Connecticut)","state":"CT","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-CT","issuer":"Supreme Court of Connecticut (McDonald, J., for a unanimous court; Robinson, C.J., and McDonald, D\u0027Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js.)","instrument":"Casey v. Lamont, SC 20494 (argued Dec. 11, 2020; officially released Mar. 29, 2021), 338 Conn. 479, 258 A.3d 647 (2021)","title":"Kristine Casey et al. v. Governor Ned Lamont","dateIssued":"2021-03-29","startDate":"2021-03-29","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["CLOSE","ALC","CAP","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-CT-011","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-CT-011"},{"id":"DUT-IA-017","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Iowa","state":"IA","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-IA","issuer":"Supreme Court of Iowa (Mansfield, J., for a unanimous court)","instrument":"Riley Drive Entertainment I, Inc. v. Reynolds, No. 20-1510 (Iowa Feb. 18, 2022) (amended Apr. 7, 2022)","title":"Riley Drive Entertainment I, Inc. d/b/a Tonic Bar, et al. v. Governor Kimberly K. Reynolds and Iowa Department of Public Health - opinion affirming dismissal as moot","dateIssued":"2022-02-18","startDate":"2022-02-18","endDate":"","quarters":["2020Q3","2020Q4"],"types":["CLOSE","ALC","COND"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-IA-017","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-IA-017"},{"id":"DUT-OR-016","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Oregon","state":"OR","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-OR","issuer":"Oregon Court of Appeals (Kamins, J., with Tookey, P.J., and Egan, J.); review denied by the Oregon Supreme Court","instrument":"Along Came Trudy LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 330 Or App 295, 543 P3d 751 (Jan. 24, 2024), rev den, 372 Or 588 (July 18, 2024) (A178679; OLCC21V003): judicial review affirming cancellation of a Lane County restaurant and event venue\u0027s liquor license for three violations of EO 20-66 (indoor dining while prohibited)","title":"Along Came Trudy LLC, dba Along Came Trudy, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Respondent","dateIssued":"2024-01-24","startDate":"2024-01-24","endDate":"2024-07-18","quarters":["2020Q4","2021Q1"],"types":["CLOSE","CAP","MASK","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-OR-016","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-OR-016"}],"facets":{"kind":[{"value":"duty","label":"Standing duty","count":28}],"level":[{"value":"court","label":"Court","count":28}],"state":[{"value":"ME","label":"Maine","count":3},{"value":"OR","label":"Oregon","count":3},{"value":"CT","label":"Connecticut","count":2},{"value":"MN","label":"Minnesota","count":2},{"value":"MS","label":"Mississippi","count":2},{"value":"NM","label":"New Mexico","count":2},{"value":"AR","label":"Arkansas","count":1},{"value":"DC","label":"District of Columbia","count":1},{"value":"IA","label":"Iowa","count":1},{"value":"IL","label":"Illinois","count":1},{"value":"IN","label":"Indiana","count":1},{"value":"KS","label":"Kansas","count":1},{"value":"MA","label":"Massachusetts","count":1},{"value":"MD","label":"Maryland","count":1},{"value":"MO","label":"Missouri","count":1},{"value":"NY","label":"New York","count":1},{"value":"OH","label":"Ohio","count":1},{"value":"PA","label":"Pennsylvania","count":1},{"value":"SC","label":"South Carolina","count":1},{"value":"TX","label":"Texas","count":1}],"type":[{"value":"CLOSE","label":"Business closure","count":14},{"value":"OTHER","label":"Other","count":12},{"value":"DUTY","label":"Standing duty","count":11},{"value":"GATH","label":"Gathering cap","count":9},{"value":"CAP","label":"Capacity limit","count":7},{"value":"EMP","label":"Workplace rules","count":6},{"value":"ALC","label":"Alcohol and bars","count":5},{"value":"EVT","label":"Events and venues","count":4},{"value":"COND","label":"Operating condition","count":3},{"value":"EMER","label":"Emergency declaration","count":3},{"value":"MASK","label":"Face-covering requirement","count":3},{"value":"STAY","label":"Stay-at-home","count":3},{"value":"CURF","label":"Curfew and hours","count":2},{"value":"HC","label":"Health care orders","count":1},{"value":"QUAR","label":"Quarantine and isolation","count":1},{"value":"TRAV","label":"Travel and quarantine","count":1}],"quarter":[{"value":"2020Q4","label":"2020 Q4","count":28},{"value":"2021Q1","label":"2021 Q1","count":23},{"value":"2021Q2","label":"2021 Q2","count":20},{"value":"2021Q3","label":"2021 Q3","count":19},{"value":"2020Q3","label":"2020 Q3","count":17},{"value":"2020Q2","label":"2020 Q2","count":14}],"grade":[{"value":"primary","label":"Primary source read","count":27},{"value":"secondary","label":"Confirmed from a secondary source","count":1}],"industry":[],"agency":[]}}