{"total":3,"page":1,"pageSize":25,"pages":1,"millis":16,"query":{"q":"health","state":"OR","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","kind":"","level":"court","type":"","quarter":"","grade":"","collection":"","from":"","to":"","sort":"relevance"},"items":[{"id":"DUT-OR-017","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Oregon","state":"OR","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-OR","issuer":"Oregon Court of Appeals","instrument":"JGB Enterprises, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 325 Or App 326, 529 P3d 262 (Apr. 19, 2023) (A176066): judicial review affirming a default order suspending a Lane County saloon\u0027s liquor license for 38 days for violating EO 20-66 and OHA guidance \u0027that qualified as public health laws\u0027 during Extreme Risk (Jan. 4-Feb. 20, 2021)","title":"JGB Enterprises, LLC, dba Twisted River Saloon, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Respondent","dateIssued":"2023-04-19","startDate":"2023-04-19","endDate":"","quarters":["2021Q1"],"types":["CLOSE","MASK","CAP","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-OR-017","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-OR-017"},{"id":"DUT-OR-018","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Oregon","state":"OR","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-OR","issuer":"Oregon Court of Appeals (Shorr, P.J., with Pagan, J., and O\u0027Connor, J.)","instrument":"Central Pastime, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 342 Or App 391 (Aug. 6, 2025) (A180094; OLCCV024): judicial review affirming a 72-day liquor-license suspension for failing to require employees and customers to wear face coverings on Dec. 2, 2020 (OHA July 24, 2020 guidance) and Mar. 27, 2021 (EO 20-66)","title":"In the Matter of the Full-On Premises Sales License Held By Central Pastime, LLC, dba Central Pastime, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Respondent","dateIssued":"2025-08-06","startDate":"2025-08-06","endDate":"","quarters":["2020Q4","2021Q1"],"types":["MASK","EMP","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-OR-018","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-OR-018"},{"id":"DUT-OR-019","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Oregon","state":"OR","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-OR","issuer":"Supreme Court of Oregon","instrument":"Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and \u0027may\u0027 be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care)","title":"Shahtout, Petitioner on Review, v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. et al, Respondents on Review","dateIssued":"1985-02-12","startDate":"1985-02-12","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-OR-019","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-OR-019"}],"facets":{"kind":[{"value":"duty","label":"Standing duty","count":3}],"level":[{"value":"court","label":"Court","count":3}],"state":[{"value":"OR","label":"Oregon","count":3}],"type":[{"value":"OTHER","label":"Other","count":3},{"value":"MASK","label":"Face-covering requirement","count":2},{"value":"CAP","label":"Capacity limit","count":1},{"value":"CLOSE","label":"Business closure","count":1},{"value":"DUTY","label":"Standing duty","count":1},{"value":"EMP","label":"Workplace rules","count":1}],"quarter":[{"value":"2021Q1","label":"2021 Q1","count":3},{"value":"2020Q4","label":"2020 Q4","count":2},{"value":"2020Q2","label":"2020 Q2","count":1},{"value":"2020Q3","label":"2020 Q3","count":1},{"value":"2021Q2","label":"2021 Q2","count":1},{"value":"2021Q3","label":"2021 Q3","count":1}],"grade":[{"value":"primary","label":"Primary source read","count":3}],"industry":[],"agency":[]}}