{"total":3,"page":1,"pageSize":25,"pages":1,"millis":1,"query":{"q":"occupational safety","state":"","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","kind":"","level":"court","type":"","quarter":"2020Q3","grade":"","collection":"","from":"","to":"","sort":"relevance"},"items":[{"id":"KS-068","kind":"order","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Kansas","state":"KS","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"KS","issuer":"Kansas Supreme Court","instrument":"Administrative Order 2020-PR-099","title":"District and Appellate Court Operations as of September 4, 2020","dateIssued":"2020-09-04","startDate":"2020-09-04","endDate":"2020-12-01","quarters":["2020Q3","2020Q4"],"types":["CRT","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/KS-068","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/KS-068"},{"id":"DUT-AZ-017","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"Arizona (Maricopa County Superior Court)","state":"AZ","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-AZ","issuer":"Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County (Hon. Timothy J. Thomason)","instrument":"Minute entry ruling (Docket Code 926) on plaintiffs\u0027 request for injunctive relief","title":"Mountainside Fitness Acquisitions, Inc. et al. v. Ducey, No. CV2020-093916 (Maricopa Cnty. Super. Ct. Aug. 4, 2020)","dateIssued":"2020-08-04","startDate":"2020-08-04","endDate":"2020-08-10","quarters":["2020Q3"],"types":["CLOSE","COND","EMP"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-AZ-017","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-AZ-017"},{"id":"DUT-SC-020","kind":"duty","level":"court","jurisdiction":"South Carolina","state":"SC","metro":"","industry":"","agency":"","collection":"DUT-SC","issuer":"Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina)","instrument":"Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)","title":"Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se from violation of a protective statute","dateIssued":"1991-10-14","startDate":"1991-10-14","endDate":"2021-09-30","quarters":["2020Q2","2020Q3","2020Q4","2021Q1","2021Q2","2021Q3"],"types":["DUTY","OTHER"],"grade":"primary","fileExists":true,"url":"/library/DUT-SC-020","exhibitUrl":"/exhibit/DUT-SC-020"}],"facets":{"kind":[{"value":"duty","label":"Standing duty","count":2},{"value":"order","label":"Order","count":1}],"level":[{"value":"court","label":"Court","count":3}],"state":[{"value":"AZ","label":"Arizona","count":1},{"value":"KS","label":"Kansas","count":1},{"value":"SC","label":"South Carolina","count":1}],"type":[{"value":"EMP","label":"Workplace rules","count":2},{"value":"CLOSE","label":"Business closure","count":1},{"value":"COND","label":"Operating condition","count":1},{"value":"CRT","label":"Courts and public offices","count":1},{"value":"DUTY","label":"Standing duty","count":1},{"value":"OTHER","label":"Other","count":1}],"quarter":[{"value":"2020Q3","label":"2020 Q3","count":3},{"value":"2020Q4","label":"2020 Q4","count":2},{"value":"2020Q2","label":"2020 Q2","count":1},{"value":"2021Q1","label":"2021 Q1","count":1},{"value":"2021Q2","label":"2021 Q2","count":1},{"value":"2021Q3","label":"2021 Q3","count":1}],"grade":[{"value":"primary","label":"Primary source read","count":3}],"industry":[],"agency":[]}}