| Ex. DUT-OR-018 | Central Pastime, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 342 Or App 391 (Aug. 6, 2025) (A180094; OLCCV024): judicial review affirming a 72-day liquor-license suspension for failing to require employees and customers to wear face coverings on Dec. 2, 2020 (OHA July 24, 2020 guidance) and Mar. 27, 2021 (EO 20-66)In the Matter of the Full-On Premises Sales License Held By Central Pastime, LLC, dba Central Pastime, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and… | Oregon Court of Appeals (Shorr, P.J., with Pagan, J., and O'Connor, J.) | OregonCourt | Aug. 6, 2025 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-VA-018 | Tigges v. Northam, Memorandum Order denying the motion for a preliminary injunction (Dk. No. 19), Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-410Tigges v. Northam, 473 F. Supp. 3d 559 (E.D. Va. 2020) | John A. Gibney, Jr., United States District Judge | Virginia (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division)Court | July 21, 2020 | 2020 Q3 | Standing dutyCapacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementOperating conditionOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MO-015 | Hawse v. Page, No. 20-1960 (8th Cir. July 30, 2021), reported at 7 F.4th 685Lauren Hawse, et al. v. Sam Page, County Executive of St. Louis County, and Faisal Khan, Director of the St. Louis County Public Health… | United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (Colloton, J., joined by Kelly and Stras, JJ.) | Missouri (St. Louis County orders; Eighth Circuit)Court | July 30, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeCapacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-017 | Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 40 (D. Md. May 20, 2020) (refusing a preliminary injunction against the Governor's orders)Antietam Battlefield KOA, et al. v. Lawrence J. Hogan, et al., Memorandum (Civil Action No. CCB-20-1130) | United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.) | Maryland (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)Court | May 20, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capFace-covering requirementStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-018 | Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 71 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2020) (granting the motion to dismiss the amended complaint)Antietam Battlefield KOA, et al. v. Lawrence J. Hogan, et al., Memorandum (Civil Action No. CCB-20-1130) | United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.) | Maryland (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)Court | Nov. 18, 2020 | 2020 Q4 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capFace-covering requirementStanding duty | Primary source read | |