| Ex. DUT-MD-015 | RegulationCOMAR 10.15.03.14, Personnel Health and Sanitation: the person-in-charge's duty to exclude ill and symptomatic food employees, to require… | Secretary of Health (Code of Maryland Regulations, Title 10, Subtitle 15, Chapter 03, Food Service Facilities) | MarylandState | Aug. 2, 1989 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-014 | RegulationCOMAR 10.06.01.06, General Control Measures: duty of the Secretary and health officers to take any necessary action; duty of individuals… | Secretary of Health (Code of Maryland Regulations, Title 10, Subtitle 06, Chapter 01, Communicable Diseases and Related Conditions of Public Health Importance) | MarylandState | Sept. 1, 2004 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureSchools and child careWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-009 | StatuteImmunity of health care providers acting in good faith and under a catastrophic health emergency proclamation | Maryland General Assembly (Public Safety Article, Title 14, Subtitle 3A) | MarylandState | Mar. 5, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyHealth care ordersOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-017 | Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 40 (D. Md. May 20, 2020) (refusing a preliminary injunction against the Governor's orders)Antietam Battlefield KOA, et al. v. Lawrence J. Hogan, et al., Memorandum (Civil Action No. CCB-20-1130) | United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.) | Maryland (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)Court | May 20, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capFace-covering requirementStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-018 | Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 71 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2020) (granting the motion to dismiss the amended complaint)Antietam Battlefield KOA, et al. v. Lawrence J. Hogan, et al., Memorandum (Civil Action No. CCB-20-1130) | United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.) | Maryland (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)Court | Nov. 18, 2020 | 2020 Q4 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capFace-covering requirementStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-013 | Session law (Maryland Essential Workers' Protection Act), codified at Md. Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. §§ 3-1701 to 3-1709 (enacted as Subtitle 16, §§ 3-1601 to 3-1609, and renumbered by the codifier)Labor and Employment - Employment Standards During an Emergency (Maryland Essential Workers' Protection Act) | Maryland General Assembly (Chapter 736 of the Acts of 2021, House Bill 581; crossfile SB 486) | MarylandState | May 30, 2021 | 2021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyOperating condition | Primary source read | |