| Ex. MET-PHX-007 | Pima County Resolution No. 2020-49 (June 19, 2020) and Resolution No. 2020-96 (Dec. 4, 2020) (face coverings); Attorney General Opinion No. I21-003 on Executive Order 2021-06Executive Order 2021-06 and Pima County Resolution No. 2020-96 | Pima County Board of Supervisors (Resolutions 2020-49 and 2020-96), as recited in Arizona Attorney General informal Opinion No. I21-003 (Apr. 6, 2021) | Pima County, Arizona (with State of Arizona, Attorney General)County | June 19, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-PHX-001 | Regulations Requiring Face Coverings in Maricopa CountyRegulations Requiring Face Coverings in Maricopa County | Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (Clint Hickman, Chairman) | Maricopa County, ArizonaCounty | June 19, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-PHX-023 | Amended Regulations Requiring Face Coverings in Maricopa CountyAmended Regulations Requiring Face Coverings in Maricopa County | Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (Clint Hickman, Chairman) | Maricopa County, ArizonaCounty | June 26, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-PHX-034 | Press report on Attorney General Opinion I21-003 and local responses to EO 2021-06AG says counties can ignore mask mandate ban, but Ducey can enforce in other ways | AZ Mirror (Jerod MacDonald-Evoy), 'AG says counties can ignore mask mandate ban, but Ducey can enforce in other ways' (secondary source) | Arizona (Pima County; Phoenix; Tucson; Flagstaff)County | Apr. 7, 2021 | 2021 Q2 | Face-covering requirement | Confirmed from a secondary source | |