| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-014 | Standing Order No. 1 Concerning COVID-19 Precautionary MeasuresFirst Superior Court standing order: telephonic proceedings favored; notice-and-confer requirements for trials involving possibly infected… | Superior Court of the State of Delaware (President Judge Jan R. Jurden) | Superior Court of the State of Delaware (statewide trial court of general jurisdiction)Court | Mar. 9, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Courts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-018 | Standing Order No. 5 Concerning COVID-19 Precautionary MeasuresGrand jury proceedings, criminal case reviews, suppression hearings, most criminal motions, sentencings and criminal trials suspended and… | Superior Court of the State of Delaware (President Judge Jan R. Jurden) | Superior Court of the State of Delaware (statewide)Court | Apr. 3, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Courts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-021 | Order Declaring a Judicial EmergencyDeclaration of a statewide judicial emergency effective 8:00 a.m. March 16, 2020 for 30 days; trial courts authorized to continue all trials… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (Chief Justice; statewide)Court | Mar. 13, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Emergency declarationGathering capCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-033 | General Administrative Order No. 2020-07: COVID-19 Emergency Measures, Modification of OperationsWinter 2020 re-tightening: all matters by videoconference except in extraordinary or compelling circumstances; judges and employees to work… | Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans, Circuit Court of Cook County | Circuit Court of Cook County, IllinoisCourt | Nov. 23, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Telework mandateCapacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-038 | General Administrative Order No. 2021-02: Residential eviction proceedings, proceduresProcedures governing residential eviction proceedings from June 25, 2021 as the statewide moratorium was phased out: which cases may be… | Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans, Circuit Court of Cook County | Circuit Court of Cook County, IllinoisCourt | June 25, 2021 | 2021 Q22021 Q3 | Courts and public officesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-041 | Release: Delaware Courts to restore mask mandate on Monday, August 16, 2021 to combat the COVID-19 Delta variant; Chief Justice also orders mandatory weekly COVID testing for all unvaccinated court employeesRelease announcing universal masking in all State court facilities from Aug. 16, 2021 and weekly testing of unvaccinated judicial employees… | Delaware Judiciary, for Chief Justice Seitz ('as administrative head of all state courts') | Delaware Judiciary (statewide)Court | Aug. 11, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesVaccination or testing | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-047 | Administrative Order No. 5: Use of Face Masks/Coverings in Court FacilitiesFace coverings required for court staff, lawyers, litigants, jurors, contractors, vendors and all visitors in common and public areas of… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (statewide)Court | Apr. 30, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-062 | Administrative Order of August 11, 2021 (universal masking in judicial facilities; weekly testing of unvaccinated judicial officers and employees)Q3 2021 Delta-wave order: face masks for all persons entering any judicial facility regardless of vaccination status from Aug. 16, 2021… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (statewide)Court | Aug. 11, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesVaccination or testing | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-076 | Supreme Judicial Court Order in re COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic regarding access to state courthouses and court facilities (OE-144)Persons diagnosed with, exposed to or symptomatic of coronavirus, persons asked to self-quarantine, and persons who had travelled to China… | Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts | Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (statewide)Court | Mar. 13, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Travel and quarantineCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-080 | Supreme Judicial Court Seventh Updated Order Regarding Court Operations Under the Exigent Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (entered July 1, 2021, effective July 12, 2021; amended Dec. 31, 2021 and Jan. 24, 2022)Q3 2021 court-operations order: end of Phase 3 jury-trial limits on July 9, 2021 but continued COVID-19 provisions, including six-person… | Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts | Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts (statewide)Court | July 1, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Gathering capCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AL-062 | Administrative Order No. 11: Revoking Previous Administrative Orders Related to COVID-19 Pandemic Emergency ResponseJudicial state of emergency ends at 5:00 p.m. July 7, 2021; all prior COVID-19 administrative orders revoked except No. 10 | Supreme Court of Alabama | AlabamaCourt | July 7, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Emergency declarationCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AL-064 | Administrative Order No. 13: Declaring a Temporary State of Emergency and Authorizing the Use of Audio/Video Technologies in Place of In-Person ProceedingsSecond judicial state of emergency (Delta wave); rules impeding audio-video proceedings superseded from August 23 to November 29, 2021 | Supreme Court of Alabama | AlabamaCourt | Aug. 20, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Emergency declarationCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AR-081 | Hickey v. McClane, No. CV-21-421, Formal Order (Ark. Sept. 30, 2021)Order denying the legislative leaders' motion for immediate stay of the preliminary injunction against Act 1002 | Supreme Court of Arkansas | ArkansasCourt | Sept. 30, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. CT-073 | Notice Regarding Amendment to Executive Order No. 7G (removal of the suspension of Supreme and Appellate Court filings)Notice Regarding Amendment to Executive Order No. 7G | Connecticut Judicial Branch (Chief Justice; Office of the Appellate Clerk) | ConnecticutCourt | June 10, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Courts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-AR-017 | Sullivan v. Romero, order of dismissal (Pulaski Cnty. Cir. Ct., Oct. 2020); appeal No. CV-20-721 dismissed on appellants' motion (Ark. Apr. 2021)Sullivan v. Romero: eighteen legislators' challenge to forty-three Department of Health COVID-19 directives (Mar. 13-Aug. 21, 2020) as rules… | Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas (Judge Wendell Griffen); Supreme Court of Arkansas (No. CV-20-721) | ArkansasCourt | | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Standing dutyOther | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. DUT-AZ-017 | Minute entry ruling (Docket Code 926) on plaintiffs' request for injunctive reliefMountainside Fitness Acquisitions, Inc. et al. v. Ducey, No. CV2020-093916 (Maricopa Cnty. Super. Ct. Aug. 4, 2020) | Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County (Hon. Timothy J. Thomason) | Arizona (Maricopa County Superior Court)Court | Aug. 4, 2020 | 2020 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureWorkplace rulesOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-AZ-019 | Published opinionMiller v. City of Scottsdale, No. 22-16004 (9th Cir. Dec. 8, 2023) | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (published opinion; Hurwitz, J., concurring) | United States (9th Cir.)Court | Dec. 8, 2023 | 2020 Q2 | Standing dutyBusiness closureStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-CO-012 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction, Lawrence v. Colorado, No. 1:20-cv-00862-DDD-SKC, ECF No. 19Order Denying Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction | Hon. Daniel D. Domenico, U.S. District Judge | Colorado (United States District Court for the District of Colorado)Court | Apr. 19, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-CT-007 | Amato v. Elicker, No. 3:20-cv-464 (MPS), ECF No. 32, Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (D. Conn. May 19, 2020), reported at 460 F. Supp. 3d 202Amato v. Elicker: ruling denying a New Haven restaurant's motion to enjoin Executive Orders 7, 7D, 7G and 7N | United States District Court, D. Conn. (Shea, J.) | Connecticut (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut)Court | May 19, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureGathering capOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-IL-010 | Fox Fire Tavern, LLC v. Pritzker, 2020 IL App (2d) 200623Reversal of a temporary restraining order against Executive Order 2020-61; the IEMA Act plainly authorizes successive disaster… | Illinois Appellate Court, Second District (Justice Zenoff, with Justices Hutchinson and Brennan) | Illinois (Appellate Court, Second District)Court | Nov. 13, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limitAlcohol and barsOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-ME-013 | Order on Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. Mills, No. 1:20-cv-00156-NT, ECF No. 27 (D. Me. May 9, 2020), reported at 459 F. Supp. 3d 273Calvary Chapel of Bangor v. Mills: order refusing a temporary restraining order against the ten-person gathering limit as applied to worship | Hon. Nancy Torresen, U.S. District Judge | United States District Court for the District of MaineCourt | May 9, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capEvents and venues | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MN-017 | State of Minnesota v. Alibi Drinkery, LLC, No. 19HA-CV-20-4167, Temporary Injunction with incorporated memorandum (filed Dec. 31, 2020)Temporary Injunction: State's request granted; Defendant's request to dissolve the temporary restraining order denied; Executive Order 20-99… | Minnesota District Court, First Judicial District, Dakota County (Hon. Jerome B. Abrams) | Minnesota (Dakota County, First Judicial District)Court | Dec. 31, 2020 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limit | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-018 | Central Pastime, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 342 Or App 391 (Aug. 6, 2025) (A180094; OLCCV024): judicial review affirming a 72-day liquor-license suspension for failing to require employees and customers to wear face coverings on Dec. 2, 2020 (OHA July 24, 2020 guidance) and Mar. 27, 2021 (EO 20-66)In the Matter of the Full-On Premises Sales License Held By Central Pastime, LLC, dba Central Pastime, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and… | Oregon Court of Appeals (Shorr, P.J., with Pagan, J., and O'Connor, J.) | OregonCourt | Aug. 6, 2025 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-VT-018 | State of Vermont v. Club Fitness of Vermont, Inc. and Sean Manovill (Rutland Superior Court, Civil Division, filed May 15, 2020): complaint for preliminary injunction and civil penalties; temporary restraining order granted May 15, 2020Vermont AG files first Covid-19 non-compliance lawsuit against Rutland gym (VTDigger, May 15, 2020) | State of Vermont, Attorney General T.J. Donovan (plaintiff); Rutland Superior Court (temporary restraining order); reported by VTDigger (Alan J. Keays), May 15, 2020 | Vermont (Rutland Superior Court, Civil Division)Court | May 15, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Standing dutyEmergency declarationBusiness closureStanding duty | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. DUT-WA-020 | Slidewaters LLC v. Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, No. 20-35634Opinion affirming denial of injunctive relief and dismissal of claims against Proclamations 20-05 and 20-25 and L&I emergency rule WAC… | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Gould, Clifton, Bress, JJ.; opinion by Judge Clifton) | Washington (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, on appeal from E.D. Wash.)Court | July 8, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureWorkplace rulesOperating condition | Primary source read | |