| Ex. DUT-OR-019 | Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and 'may' be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care)Shahtout, Petitioner on Review, v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. et al, Respondents on Review | Supreme Court of Oregon | OregonCourt | Feb. 12, 1985 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OH-017 | Court decisionEicher v. United States Steel Corp., 32 Ohio St.3d 248 (1987) (decided September 2, 1987) | Supreme Court of Ohio (per curiam; No. 86-1793) | OhioCourt | Sept. 2, 1987 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-SC-020 | Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se… | Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina) | South CarolinaCourt | Oct. 14, 1991 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-013 | Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Travis, 808 So. 2d 928 (Miss. 2002), No. 2000-IA-01074-SCT (Feb. 28, 2002)Employer's 'non-delegable duty to provide a reasonably safe place to work' (claims of ninety-nine employees arising from the employer's… | Supreme Court of Mississippi (Smith, P.J., for the Court) | MississippiCourt | Feb. 28, 2002 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-014 | Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. Armond, 866 So. 2d 1092 (Miss. 2004), No. 2003-IA-00398-SCT (Feb. 19, 2004)The Supreme Court's statement of its Travis holding: all the employees' claims 'arose out of ICR's policy of not warning or protecting its… | Supreme Court of Mississippi | MississippiCourt | Feb. 19, 2004 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MO-010 | Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., 489 S.W.3d 784 (Mo. banc 2016), No. SC94442, opinion issued June 7, 2016Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick Terrio | Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc (Breckenridge, C.J.; Stith, Draper and Russell, JJ., concurring; Fischer, J., concurring in result; Wilson and Teitelman, JJ., in separate opinions) | MissouriCourt | June 7, 2016 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-021 | Order Declaring a Judicial EmergencyDeclaration of a statewide judicial emergency effective 8:00 a.m. March 16, 2020 for 30 days; trial courts authorized to continue all trials… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (Chief Justice; statewide)Court | Mar. 13, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Emergency declarationGathering capCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-001 | In re: COVID-19 State of Emergency, En Banc, Misc. No. 260En banc decision temporarily suspending WCAB Rules of Practice and Procedure statewide and recognizing the closure of DWC district offices… | Workers' Compensation Appeals Board of the State of California (en banc) | California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (State workers' compensation tribunal; statewide)Court | Mar. 18, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Emergency declarationCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-TX-021 | In re Abbott, No. 20-50264 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2020) (published), 954 F.3d 772In re Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, et al. (petition for writ of mandamus; GA-09) | United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Duncan, J., joined by Elrod, J.; Dennis, J., dissenting) | Texas (United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit)Court | Apr. 7, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyEmergency declarationHealth care ordersStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-KS-020 | Kelly v. Legislative Coordinating Council, No. 122,765 (Kan. Apr. 11, 2020) (original action in quo warranto; quo warranto granted in part)Laura Kelly, Governor of the State of Kansas, v. Legislative Coordinating Council, et al. | Supreme Court of Kansas (per curiam) | KansasCourt | Apr. 11, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyGathering capEvents and venuesStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-048 | Administrative Order No. 7 (extension of the judicial emergency effective June 8, 2020; adoption of the four-phase Courts Reopening Plan)Third 30-day extension; Phase 1 reopening from June 8, 2020 and Phase 2 from June 15, 2020: courthouses open to the public with face… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (statewide)Court | June 5, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Emergency declarationCapacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-050 | Administrative Order No. 8: Extension of Judicial EmergencyFourth 30-day extension effective July 8, 2020; courts to remain in Phase 2; no entry into Phase 3 'until medical experts believe it is… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (statewide)Court | July 6, 2020 | 2020 Q3 | Emergency declarationCapacity limitCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-051 | Administrative Order No. 9: Extension of Judicial EmergencyFifth 30-day extension effective Aug. 7, 2020; Phase 2 continued; Phase 3 deferred citing 'new quarantine requirements by other states, and… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (statewide)Court | Aug. 5, 2020 | 2020 Q3 | Emergency declarationCapacity limitCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-AK-009 | Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Injunction, Municipality of Anchorage v. Kriner's Diner, LLC, et al., No. 3AN-20-07394 CIOrder Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Injunction (compliance with Emergency Order EO-15; indoor dining prohibited) | Superior Court for the State of Alaska, Third Judicial District at Anchorage (Eric A. Aarseth, Superior Court Judge) | Alaska (Third Judicial District at Anchorage)Court | Aug. 7, 2020 | 2020 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureStanding dutyOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-027 | Release: Delaware Judiciary unveils plan to resume jury trials in October, extends emergency until Oct. 5, 2020Release announcing the jury-trial resumption plan (modified Phase 3 from October 2020; facilities to 75 percent capacity) and the extension… | Delaware Judiciary, for Chief Justice Seitz | Delaware Judiciary (statewide)Court | Sept. 4, 2020 | 2020 Q32020 Q4 | Context (guidance or announcement)Emergency declarationCapacity limitFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-052 | Administrative Order No. 10: Extension of Judicial Emergency (with the Jury Management Plan as Exhibit 1)Sixth 30-day extension effective Sept. 6, 2020; Phase 2 continued in September; modified Phase 3 from Oct. 5, 2020 with courthouses open to… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (statewide)Court | Sept. 4, 2020 | 2020 Q32020 Q4 | Emergency declarationCapacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-VT-019 | State v. Club Fitness of Vermont, Inc. / Manovill v. State of Vermont, Scott and Donovan (Rutland Super. Ct., Civ. Div.): decision granting the State's motion to dismiss the gym owner's constitutional and takings claims (19 pages, week of September 28, 2020)Judge tosses bid by Rutland gym owner to collect from state over Covid-19 closure (VTDigger, Sept. 30, 2020) | Judge Robert Mello, Rutland Superior Court, Civil Division (decision of September 2020); reported by VTDigger (Alan J. Keays), September 30, 2020 | Vermont (Rutland Superior Court, Civil Division)Court | Sept. 30, 2020 | 2020 Q3 | Standing dutyEmergency declarationBusiness closureStanding duty | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. DUT-MN-018 | Snell v. Walz, No. A21-0626 (Minn. May 10, 2024), 6 N.W.3d 458Snell v. Walz (Snell II): the Emergency Management Act authorizes the declaration of a peacetime emergency in response to a pandemic; no… | Supreme Court of Minnesota (Moore, III, J.; Anderson, J., concurring; Procaccini, J., took no part) | MinnesotaCourt | May 10, 2024 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyEmergency declarationOther | Primary source read | |