| Ex. DUT-OR-019 | Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and 'may' be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care)Shahtout, Petitioner on Review, v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. et al, Respondents on Review | Supreme Court of Oregon | OregonCourt | Feb. 12, 1985 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OH-017 | Court decisionEicher v. United States Steel Corp., 32 Ohio St.3d 248 (1987) (decided September 2, 1987) | Supreme Court of Ohio (per curiam; No. 86-1793) | OhioCourt | Sept. 2, 1987 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-SC-020 | Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se… | Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina) | South CarolinaCourt | Oct. 14, 1991 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-013 | Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Travis, 808 So. 2d 928 (Miss. 2002), No. 2000-IA-01074-SCT (Feb. 28, 2002)Employer's 'non-delegable duty to provide a reasonably safe place to work' (claims of ninety-nine employees arising from the employer's… | Supreme Court of Mississippi (Smith, P.J., for the Court) | MississippiCourt | Feb. 28, 2002 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-014 | Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. Armond, 866 So. 2d 1092 (Miss. 2004), No. 2003-IA-00398-SCT (Feb. 19, 2004)The Supreme Court's statement of its Travis holding: all the employees' claims 'arose out of ICR's policy of not warning or protecting its… | Supreme Court of Mississippi | MississippiCourt | Feb. 19, 2004 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MO-010 | Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., 489 S.W.3d 784 (Mo. banc 2016), No. SC94442, opinion issued June 7, 2016Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick Terrio | Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc (Breckenridge, C.J.; Stith, Draper and Russell, JJ., concurring; Fischer, J., concurring in result; Wilson and Teitelman, JJ., in separate opinions) | MissouriCourt | June 7, 2016 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CLE-014 | Order Declaring a Judicial Emergency and Continuity of Operations of the Court Due to COVID-19 Pandemic (Journal Entry)In re: Order Declaring a Judicial Emergency and Continuity of Operations of the Court Due to COVID-19 Pandemic | Judges of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, General Division | Cuyahoga County, OhioCourt | Mar. 16, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Gathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. VT-049 | Administrative Order No. 49Declaration of Judicial Emergency and Changes to Court Procedures | Vermont Supreme Court (memo to the bar by the State Court Administrator) | VermontCourt | Mar. 16, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Telework mandateGathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. MET-CIN-003 | Joint Administrative Order re Courthouse Access Screening Under Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19In re: Courthouse Access Screening Under Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 | Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, General Division, and Hamilton County Municipal Court (Judges Kubicki and Russell) | Hamilton County, OhioCourt | Apr. 6, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Courts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-TX-021 | In re Abbott, No. 20-50264 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2020) (published), 954 F.3d 772In re Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, et al. (petition for writ of mandamus; GA-09) | United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Duncan, J., joined by Elrod, J.; Dennis, J., dissenting) | Texas (United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit)Court | Apr. 7, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyEmergency declarationHealth care ordersStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CLE-029 | Amended Order Declaring Judicial Emergency and Outlining Court Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Journal Entry)In re: Amended Order Declaring Judicial Emergency and Outlining Court Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic | Judges of the Cleveland Municipal Court, General Division | City of Cleveland, OhioCourt | Apr. 9, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Telework mandateGathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-KS-020 | Kelly v. Legislative Coordinating Council, No. 122,765 (Kan. Apr. 11, 2020) (original action in quo warranto; quo warranto granted in part)Laura Kelly, Governor of the State of Kansas, v. Legislative Coordinating Council, et al. | Supreme Court of Kansas (per curiam) | KansasCourt | Apr. 11, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyGathering capEvents and venuesStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. SC-048 | Order re Operation of the Trial Courts During the Coronavirus Emergency (As Amended April 22, 2020) (2020-04-22-01)Amended statewide trial-court operations order | Supreme Court of South Carolina | South CarolinaCourt | Apr. 22, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Gathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DCM-041 | Order, In re Public Notice of COVID-19 Related Courthouse-Entry Screening, CM 2020-48700Order directing courthouse-entry screening and posting of notice (effective April 27, 2020) | Circuit Court of Fairfax County | Fairfax County, VirginiaCourt | Apr. 24, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Courts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-TRADE-BOARDS-074 | Order (filed May 4, 2020): Uniform Bar Examination rescheduled to Sept. 9-10, 2020 'pandemic-related conditions and restrictions permitting'; social distancing to limit seating; masks required; temperature and screening; priority registration for 2019-2020 graduatesOrder of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (May 4, 2020) regarding rescheduling the bar exam | District of Columbia Court of Appeals | District of Columbia; District of Columbia Court of AppealsCourt | May 4, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q3 | Capacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MT-058 | Revised Memorandum of the Chief Justice, April 27, 2020 (court practices after May 4, 2020)Montana Supreme Court, For Immediate Release, April 27, 2020 (COVID-19 Revised Memo from Chief Justice McGrath) | Chief Justice Mike McGrath, Supreme Court of Montana | Montana (statewide judiciary)Court | Apr. 27, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Gathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. WV-073 | Administrative Order: Resumption of Operations, with COVID-19 Resumption of Operations ProtocolsJudicial emergency continued through May 15, 2020; in-person hearings from May 18, grand juries from June 15, jury trials from June 29… | Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia | West VirginiaCourt | May 6, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Courts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-KC-055 | Administrative Order 2020-084Updated Court Operations upon Re-Opening of Courthouses | Presiding Judge, 16th Judicial Circuit | 16th Judicial Circuit of Missouri (Jackson County)Court | May 18, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Gathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. ECO-C-131 | Administrative Order No. 2020-79Authorizing Limitation of Court Operations During a Public Health Emergency and Transition to Resumption of Certain Operations (June 1, 2020… | Arizona Supreme Court | ArizonaCourt | May 20, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q3 | Telework mandateGathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. FL-067 | Administrative Order No. AOSC20-32In re: COVID-19 Public Health and Safety Precautions for Phase 2 | Chief Justice Charles T. Canady, Supreme Court of Florida | Florida (all State courts)Court | May 21, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Gathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. WI-027 | Order, In re the Matter of the Extension of Orders and Interim Rule Concerning Continuation of Jury Trials, Suspension of Statutory Deadlines for Non-Criminal Jury Trials, and Remote Hearings During the COVID-19 PandemicOrder extending the in-person suspension and jury-trial continuance for each circuit court until a chief-judge-approved operational plan… | Wisconsin Supreme Court | WisconsinCourt | May 22, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-MSY-043 | Amended Phase I Opening Plan, May 25, 2020Civil District Court, First and Second City Court Amended Phase I Opening Plan: pre-screening, temperature scans and face masks required for… | Civil District Court and First and Second City Court (Judicial Administrator) | Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans; First and Second City CourtsCourt | May 25, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CLE-013 | Court of Common Pleas COVID-19 page (Justice Center building access, health screening, face coverings, courtroom caps, jury-trial suspension) as of July 1, 2020COVID-19 | CCCCP (court operations page) | Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, General Division (Administrative and Presiding Judge Brendan J. Sheehan) | Cuyahoga County, OhioCourt | July 1, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Capacity limitFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CLE-018 | Order Regarding Continuity of Operations to Maximize Social Distancing Due to COVID-19 Pandemic (Journal Entry)In re: Order Regarding Continuity of Operations to Maximize Social Distancing Due to COVID-19 Pandemic | Judges of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, General Division | Cuyahoga County, OhioCourt | May 26, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q1 | Capacity limitFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CIN-004 | Joint Amended Administrative Order, No. M200001 (entered May 29, 2020)In re: Courthouse Operations and Access Under Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 | Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, General Division, and Hamilton County Municipal Court | Hamilton County, OhioCourt | May 29, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q3 | Gathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |