| Ex. DUT-OR-019 | Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and 'may' be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care)Shahtout, Petitioner on Review, v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. et al, Respondents on Review | Supreme Court of Oregon | OregonCourt | Feb. 12, 1985 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OH-017 | Court decisionEicher v. United States Steel Corp., 32 Ohio St.3d 248 (1987) (decided September 2, 1987) | Supreme Court of Ohio (per curiam; No. 86-1793) | OhioCourt | Sept. 2, 1987 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-SC-020 | Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se… | Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina) | South CarolinaCourt | Oct. 14, 1991 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-013 | Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Travis, 808 So. 2d 928 (Miss. 2002), No. 2000-IA-01074-SCT (Feb. 28, 2002)Employer's 'non-delegable duty to provide a reasonably safe place to work' (claims of ninety-nine employees arising from the employer's… | Supreme Court of Mississippi (Smith, P.J., for the Court) | MississippiCourt | Feb. 28, 2002 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-014 | Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. Armond, 866 So. 2d 1092 (Miss. 2004), No. 2003-IA-00398-SCT (Feb. 19, 2004)The Supreme Court's statement of its Travis holding: all the employees' claims 'arose out of ICR's policy of not warning or protecting its… | Supreme Court of Mississippi | MississippiCourt | Feb. 19, 2004 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MO-010 | Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., 489 S.W.3d 784 (Mo. banc 2016), No. SC94442, opinion issued June 7, 2016Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick Terrio | Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc (Breckenridge, C.J.; Stith, Draper and Russell, JJ., concurring; Fischer, J., concurring in result; Wilson and Teitelman, JJ., in separate opinions) | MissouriCourt | June 7, 2016 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CLE-014 | Order Declaring a Judicial Emergency and Continuity of Operations of the Court Due to COVID-19 Pandemic (Journal Entry)In re: Order Declaring a Judicial Emergency and Continuity of Operations of the Court Due to COVID-19 Pandemic | Judges of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, General Division | Cuyahoga County, OhioCourt | Mar. 16, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Gathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. VT-049 | Administrative Order No. 49Declaration of Judicial Emergency and Changes to Court Procedures | Vermont Supreme Court (memo to the bar by the State Court Administrator) | VermontCourt | Mar. 16, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Telework mandateGathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. MET-PDX-050 | Index of Presiding Judge Orders on court operations during COVID-19: Mar. 27, 2020 (parenting time); Apr. 10, 2020 (civil trials; criminal proceedings; family, juvenile and probate proceedings during the pandemic); Apr. 21, 2020 (supplemental family, juvenile, probate); June 2, 2020 (protective face coverings in court facilities); June 15, 2020 (civil, criminal, juvenile, family and probate proceedings under Level 2 restrictions); probate letters of Apr. 22 and June 16, 2020Court Operations During Covid-19: Judicial Orders and Information (Multnomah County Circuit Court) | Presiding Judge, Multnomah County Circuit Court; Chief Probate Judge | Multnomah County Circuit Court (Fourth Judicial District), OregonCourt | July 16, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. MO-063 | Orders of April 1, 2020 (extension of the suspension of in-person proceedings) and May 4, 2020 (Operational Directives for Easing COVID-19 Restrictions on In-Person Proceedings)Extension of the statewide suspension; phased operational directives with gateway criteria, distancing and masks | Supreme Court of Missouri | Missouri (all State courts)Court | Apr. 1, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q1 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. SC-047 | Order re Operation of the Trial Courts During the Coronavirus Emergency (2020-04-03-01)Statewide trial-court operations order: jury trials continued; hearings remote or limited to ten persons | Supreme Court of South Carolina | South CarolinaCourt | Apr. 3, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Gathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CIN-003 | Joint Administrative Order re Courthouse Access Screening Under Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19In re: Courthouse Access Screening Under Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 | Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, General Division, and Hamilton County Municipal Court (Judges Kubicki and Russell) | Hamilton County, OhioCourt | Apr. 6, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Courts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-TX-021 | In re Abbott, No. 20-50264 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2020) (published), 954 F.3d 772In re Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, et al. (petition for writ of mandamus; GA-09) | United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Duncan, J., joined by Elrod, J.; Dennis, J., dissenting) | Texas (United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit)Court | Apr. 7, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyEmergency declarationHealth care ordersStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CLE-029 | Amended Order Declaring Judicial Emergency and Outlining Court Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Journal Entry)In re: Amended Order Declaring Judicial Emergency and Outlining Court Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic | Judges of the Cleveland Municipal Court, General Division | City of Cleveland, OhioCourt | Apr. 9, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Telework mandateGathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-KS-020 | Kelly v. Legislative Coordinating Council, No. 122,765 (Kan. Apr. 11, 2020) (original action in quo warranto; quo warranto granted in part)Laura Kelly, Governor of the State of Kansas, v. Legislative Coordinating Council, et al. | Supreme Court of Kansas (per curiam) | KansasCourt | Apr. 11, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyGathering capEvents and venuesStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-PA-020 | Judicial opinion (majority opinion on an emergency application for extraordinary relief)Friends of Danny DeVito, Kathy Gregory, B&J Laundry, LLC, Blueberry Hill Public Golf Course & Lounge, and Caledonia Land Co. v. Governor Tom… | Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Donohue, J., for the Court; Saylor, C.J., Baer, Todd, Dougherty, Wecht and Mundy, JJ.) | PennsylvaniaCourt | Apr. 13, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. SD-048 | Amended Standing Order CIV 20-4 Regarding Declaration of Public Health Emergency in Minnehaha CountyStanding Order Regarding Declaration of Public Health Emergency in Minnehaha County | Presiding Judge Robin J. Houwman; approved by the Supreme Court (Gilbertson, C.J.) April 14, 2020 | Second Judicial Circuit (Minnehaha County)Court | Apr. 14, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-CO-012 | Order Denying Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction, Lawrence v. Colorado, No. 1:20-cv-00862-DDD-SKC, ECF No. 19Order Denying Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction | Hon. Daniel D. Domenico, U.S. District Judge | Colorado (United States District Court for the District of Colorado)Court | Apr. 19, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. VT-050 | Eighth Amendment to Administrative Order No. 49 (promulgated April 21, 2020)Masks required in Judiciary buildings; remote hearings expanded; parent-child contact emergencies | Vermont Supreme Court (memo to the bar) | VermontCourt | Apr. 21, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Telework mandateFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. SC-048 | Order re Operation of the Trial Courts During the Coronavirus Emergency (As Amended April 22, 2020) (2020-04-22-01)Amended statewide trial-court operations order | Supreme Court of South Carolina | South CarolinaCourt | Apr. 22, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Gathering capCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AR-021 | In re Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020 Ark. 163 (per curiam)Per curiam extending the suspension of in-person proceedings through May 15, 2020 with a ten-person courtroom limit and face coverings | Supreme Court of Arkansas | ArkansasCourt | Apr. 23, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Gathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. HI-035 | Order Regarding Judiciary Operations, SCMF-20-0000152Order extending the Mar. 16 and Mar. 20 orders through May 29, 2020, expanding remote proceedings and restricting entry to judiciary… | Supreme Court of Hawaii, Chief Justice Recktenwald | HawaiiCourt | Apr. 27, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DCM-041 | Order, In re Public Notice of COVID-19 Related Courthouse-Entry Screening, CM 2020-48700Order directing courthouse-entry screening and posting of notice (effective April 27, 2020) | Circuit Court of Fairfax County | Fairfax County, VirginiaCourt | Apr. 24, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Courts and public officesWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CLE-017 | Order Extending the Judicial Emergency and Continuity of Operations of the Court Due to COVID-19 Pandemic (Journal Entry)In re: Order Extending the Judicial Emergency and Continuity of Operations of the Court Due to COVID-19 Pandemic | Judges of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, General Division | Cuyahoga County, OhioCourt | Apr. 28, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Courts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. OK-051 | Third Emergency Joint Order Regarding the COVID-19 State of Disaster (SCAD 2020-36)Transition from shelter in place: jury trials rescheduled to after July 31, 2020; deadlines resume May 16; non-jury hearings may be set… | Supreme Court of Oklahoma and Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals | OklahomaCourt | Apr. 29, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q3 | Gathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |