| Ex. MET-DCM-071 | Face covering requirement for all Metro customers (announced May 2020)Face coverings required on Metro (Metrorail, Metrobus, MetroAccess) | WMATA | WMATASector regulator | May 14, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q1 | Face-covering requirementTravel and quarantine | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. MET-BAL-105 | MDOT MTA COVID-19 service reductions, boarding rules and face-covering requirement (agency web notice, captured Apr. 17, 2020)MDOT MTA Coronavirus (COVID-19) page: service status and face-covering requirement | Maryland Department of Transportation, Maryland Transit Administration | Baltimore region (MDOT Maryland Transit Administration: Local Bus, Light RailLink, Metro SubwayLink, MobilityLink, Commuter Bus, MARC)Sector regulator | Apr. 17, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q3 | Face-covering requirementTravel and quarantineOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DCM-046 | Memorandum: Guidelines for Face Coverings, Modification of Entry Protocols for County Buildings, and Policy on Official TravelMemorandum to All County Employees, May 28, 2021 | Tara H. Jackson, Chief Administrative Officer, Office of the County Executive (implementing Executive Order 14-2021 of May 26, 2021) | Prince George's County, MarylandCounty | May 28, 2021 | 2021 Q22021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementTravel and quarantineSchools and child careHealth care ordersWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DCM-124 | Executive Order 14-2021 (May 26, 2021), as amended by Executive Order 17-2021 (June 28, 2021)Alignment of county face-covering rules with the State of Maryland (effective May 28, 2021, 5:00 p.m.); continued local emergency | County Executive Angela D. Alsobrooks | Prince George's County, MarylandCounty | May 26, 2021 | 2021 Q22021 Q3 | Emergency declarationFace-covering requirementTravel and quarantineSchools and child careHealth care orders | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-017 | Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 40 (D. Md. May 20, 2020) (refusing a preliminary injunction against the Governor's orders)Antietam Battlefield KOA, et al. v. Lawrence J. Hogan, et al., Memorandum (Civil Action No. CCB-20-1130) | United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.) | Maryland (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)Court | May 20, 2020 | 2020 Q2 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capFace-covering requirementStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DCM-073 | COVID-19 Pandemic Recovery Plan (phased service restoration)Metro's COVID-19 gradual recovery plan (May 2020) | WMATA (General Manager/CEO) | WMATASector regulator | May 14, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Face-covering requirementTravel and quarantineOther | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-TRANSPORT-PORTS-TRANSIT-005 | MDOT MTA 'COVID-19 and MDOT MTA' page as captured July 12, 2021: 'Masks are required to be on for the duration of your ride on transit'; temporary strategic service reductions to MARC Train and Commuter Bus continuing; Transit Store temperature checks and seven-customer capacity limit; Reduced Fare Certification Office by appointment, ten-customer limitCOVID-19 and MDOT MTA - How To Ride; Status of Transit Service (masks required for the duration of the ride; MARC and Commuter Bus… | Maryland Department of Transportation, Maryland Transit Administration (MDOT MTA) | MarylandState | July 12, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Context (guidance or announcement)Capacity limitFace-covering requirementTravel and quarantine | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-007 | StatuteGovernor's orders in a catastrophic health emergency: seizure and rationing, medical examination, testing and vaccination, isolation and… | Maryland General Assembly (Public Safety Article, Title 14, Subtitle 3A, Catastrophic Health Emergencies) | MarylandState | | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capHealth care ordersVaccination or testingQuarantine and isolationStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MD-018 | Memorandum opinion, Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Hogan, No. 1:20-cv-01130-CCB, ECF No. 71 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2020) (granting the motion to dismiss the amended complaint)Antietam Battlefield KOA, et al. v. Lawrence J. Hogan, et al., Memorandum (Civil Action No. CCB-20-1130) | United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Blake, J.) | Maryland (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)Court | Nov. 18, 2020 | 2020 Q4 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capFace-covering requirementStanding duty | Primary source read | |