Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Standing duties: Alabama
  3. DUT-AL-021

Ex. DUT-AL-021 Standing duty Primary source read

Case v. Ivey, No. 2:20-cv-777-WKW, Doc. 54 (M.D. Ala. June 1, 2021) (Memorandum and Opinion Order)

Jennifer Case, et al. v. Kay Ivey, in her individual capacity and official capacity as Governor of Alabama, et al.

United States District Court, M.D. Ala. (Watkins, J.) · Alabama (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division) (Court)

The COVID Project

The record

Jurisdiction
Alabama (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division) · Alabama
Level
Court
Authority
Ala. Code §§ 31-9-3(4), 31-9-6(1), 31-9-8(a)(1), (5), (6), 31-9-13, 22-2-2(6), 22-2-8 as construed; the State's police power
Issued
2021-06-01 June 1, 2021
Effective
2021-06-01
End
n/a (judicial decision) (read as 2021-09-30)
In force
June 1, 2021 to Sept. 30, 2021
Quarters
2021 Q22021 Q3
Limitation types
Stay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesStanding duty
Addressees
  • persons generally; businesses and worship gatherings (the plaintiffs' challenged restrictions)
Character
adjudication
Collection
Standing duties: Alabama DUT-AL

Operative words

These 'rules and regulations shall have the force of law and shall be executed by the same courts, bodies, officials, agents, and employees as in the case of health laws....' Id. The authority outlined above demonstrates that Alabama law provides Dr. Harris with the ability to issue orders in response to COVID-19.

Penalty

as recited: fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment in the county jail (Ala. Code § 31-9-22)

What it required

The federal court's holding on the source of the duties: the Governor's proclamations 'squarely fall within the framework of the AEMA' (§§ 31-9-6(1), 31-9-8(a)(1), (5), (6)); the State Health Officer 'shall... take prompt measures to prevent' invading disease (§ 22-2-8) and his rules 'shall have the force of law' (§ 22-2-2(6)); the July 15, 2020 proclamation 'introduced, for the first time, enforcement language' with the $500 fine and county jail (at 11); the challenges to the orders were dismissed. Character as recorded: adjudication (order_penalty layer).

Retrieval note

Sixty-eight pages; the court's own page numbers are used for pins (the AEMA and § 22-2-2 discussion at 4-5; the July 15, 2020 promulgation and enforcement language at 11; Jacobson at 65). The court's chronology of the orders (Part II.B) is an independent judicial account of the regime in the library (Exs. AL-005 to AL-049). The reporter citation 542 F. Supp. 3d 1245 is taken from secondary references and is graded verified_secondary until checked against the reporter.