Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Standing duties: Maine
  3. DUT-ME-018

Ex. DUT-ME-018 Standing duty Primary source read

26 M.R.S. sec. 833(1)(A)-(B) (no employer may discharge, threaten or discriminate against an employee for reporting in good faith a violation of law or rule or 'a condition or practice that would put at risk the health or safety of that employee or any other individual')

26 M.R.S. sec. 833, Discrimination against certain employees prohibited (Whistleblowers' Protection Act; Maine Revised Statutes section page rendered September 28, 2026)

Maine Legislature (26 M.R.S. chapter 7, subchapter 5-B, Whistleblowers' Protection Act) · Maine (State)

The COVID Project

The record

Jurisdiction
Maine
Level
State
Authority
P.L. 1987, c. 782; P.L. 1999, c. 351; P.L. 2003, c. 306
Issued
2021-01-01 Jan. 1, 2021
Effective
standing; text in force throughout March 2020 to September 2021 (read as 2021-01-01)
End
standing (read as 2021-09-30)
In force
Standing since Jan. 1, 2021 (a statutory duty; in force throughout the six quarters)
Quarters
2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3
Limitation types
Workplace rulesStanding duty
Addressees
  • employers (all employers, public and private); employees
Character
workplace duty
Collection
Standing duties: Maine DUT-ME

Operative words

No employer may discharge, threaten or otherwise discriminate against an employee... because:... B. The employee, acting in good faith,... reports to the employer or a public body, orally or in writing, what the employee has reasonable cause to believe is a condition or practice that would put at risk the health or safety of that employee or any other individual.

Penalty

civil remedies through the Maine Human Rights Act process to which the Whistleblowers' Protection Act is joined (26 M.R.S. ch. 7, subch. 5-B), including reinstatement, back pay and damages as the Act provides

What it required

Every Maine employer, public or private, to refrain from any adverse action against an employee who reported, to the employer or to a public body, a workplace condition or practice the employee reasonably believed put the health or safety of any person at risk, or a violation of any State or federal law or rule (including the emergency orders and the communicable-disease rules), so that the employer's compliance with the health protocols was policed from inside the workplace as well as by the State.

Retrieval note

Rendered from the Revisor's live section page on Sept. 28, 2026; the section's history shows no amendment of paragraphs A and B after 1999, so the saved text is the text in force in 2020-2021. The remedies description is stated at the level of the Act's structure; The file date in the name is a placeholder for a standing statute.