Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Standing duties: North Carolina
  3. DUT-NC-018

Ex. DUT-NC-018 Standing duty Primary source read

Kinsley v. Ace Speedway Racing, Ltd., 2022-NCCOA-524, No. COA21-428 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 2, 2022)

Opinion: the terms of the June 8, 2020 Abatement Order (close until Order 141 expires or until a plan for 'full compliance with Order 141's mass gathering restrictions'), the June 11, 2020 TRO and the July 10, 2020 preliminary injunction

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · North Carolina (Court)

The COVID Project

The record

Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Level
Court
Authority
Appeal from Alamance County Superior Court, No. 20 CVS 1001
Issued
2022-08-02 Aug. 2, 2022
Effective
2022-08-02
End
n/a (judicial opinion; affirmed by Ex. DUT-NC-017)
In force
Aug. 2, 2022 (no end date recorded; counted as in force for 120 days)
Limitation types
Business closureGathering capOther
Addressees
  • specified businesses (an outdoor racetrack); venues subject to the mass-gathering restrictions
Character
adjudication
Collection
Standing duties: North Carolina DUT-NC

Operative words

The Abatement Order instructed Ace to close its facilities until the expiration of Order 141, or until such time as Ace developed a plan to host events in full compliance with Order 141's mass gathering restrictions.... [the court] "enjoined [Ace] from taking any action to conduct or facilitate a stock car race or other mass gathering at ACE Speedway[.]"

Penalty

As recited: abatement order under G.S. 130A-20 enforced by TRO (June 11, 2020) and preliminary injunction (July 10, 2020)

What it required

Records that 'The mass gathering prohibition in Order 141 nullified Ace's ability to hold economically feasible racing events' (para. 6), that the Secretary's Abatement Order found the speedway had 'operated openly in contradiction of the restrictions and recommendations in [Order 141]' and required closure and public notice of cancellation (para. 9), and that the Superior Court enforced the order by TRO and preliminary injunction (para. 10). Character as recorded: adjudication (order_penalty layer).

Retrieval note

The Court of Appeals held the speedway adequately pleaded its constitutional counterclaims; the Supreme Court affirmed (Ex. DUT-NC-017). its terms are taken from the opinion's quotations.