Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Legal authorities
  3. LAW-012

Ex. LAW-012 Legal authority Primary source read

Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020) (slip opinion)

Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020) (slip opinion)

Supreme Court of the United States (Legal authority)

The COVID Project

The record

Level
Legal authority
Authority
Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020) (slip opinion)
Issued
2020-06-15 June 15, 2020
In force
June 15, 2020 (no end date recorded; counted as in force for 120 days)
Character
case

Operative words

In the language of law, this means that Title VII's "because of" test incorporates the "simple" and "traditional" standard of but-for causation. Nassar, 570 U. S., at 346, 360. That form of causation is established whenever a particular outcome would not have happened "but for" the purported cause. See Gross, 557 U. S., at 176. In other words, a but-for test directs us to change one thing at a time and see if the outcome changes. If it does, we have found a but-for cause. This can be a sweeping standard. Often, events have multiple but-for causes.

Notes

24 MB PDF.