| Ex. DUT-OH-017 | Court decisionEicher v. United States Steel Corp., 32 Ohio St.3d 248 (1987) (decided September 2, 1987) | Supreme Court of Ohio (per curiam; No. 86-1793) | OhioCourt | Sept. 2, 1987 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-013 | Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Travis, 808 So. 2d 928 (Miss. 2002), No. 2000-IA-01074-SCT (Feb. 28, 2002)Employer's 'non-delegable duty to provide a reasonably safe place to work' (claims of ninety-nine employees arising from the employer's… | Supreme Court of Mississippi (Smith, P.J., for the Court) | MississippiCourt | Feb. 28, 2002 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MS-014 | Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. Armond, 866 So. 2d 1092 (Miss. 2004), No. 2003-IA-00398-SCT (Feb. 19, 2004)The Supreme Court's statement of its Travis holding: all the employees' claims 'arose out of ICR's policy of not warning or protecting its… | Supreme Court of Mississippi | MississippiCourt | Feb. 19, 2004 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MO-010 | Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., 489 S.W.3d 784 (Mo. banc 2016), No. SC94442, opinion issued June 7, 2016Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick Terrio | Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc (Breckenridge, C.J.; Stith, Draper and Russell, JJ., concurring; Fischer, J., concurring in result; Wilson and Teitelman, JJ., in separate opinions) | MissouriCourt | June 7, 2016 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-ME-011 | Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Bayley's Campground, Inc. v. Mills, No. 2:20-cv-00176-LEW, ECF No. 20 (D. Me. May 29, 2020), reported at 463 F. Supp. 3d 22Bayley's Campground, Inc. v. Mills: order refusing preliminary injunction against the 14-day self-quarantine requirement of Executive Order… | Hon. Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge | United States District Court for the District of MaineCourt | May 29, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyTravel and quarantineQuarantine and isolationOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-HI-015 | Order Denying Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, Carmichael v. Ige, Civil No. 20-00273 JAO-WRP, ECF No. 47 (D. Haw. July 2, 2020)Carmichael v. Ige, Order Denying Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order | United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, Otake, J. | Hawaii (United States District Court for the District of Hawaii)Court | July 2, 2020 | 2020 Q3 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeTravel and quarantineQuarantine and isolationOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-AZ-017 | Minute entry ruling (Docket Code 926) on plaintiffs' request for injunctive reliefMountainside Fitness Acquisitions, Inc. et al. v. Ducey, No. CV2020-093916 (Maricopa Cnty. Super. Ct. Aug. 4, 2020) | Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County (Hon. Timothy J. Thomason) | Arizona (Maricopa County Superior Court)Court | Aug. 4, 2020 | 2020 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureWorkplace rulesOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-ME-014 | Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Savage v. Mills, No. 1:20-cv-00165-LEW, ECF No. 26 (D. Me. Aug. 7, 2020), reported at 478 F. Supp. 3d 16Savage v. Mills (Sunday River Brewing Company): order dismissing business owners' constitutional challenge to the Governor's COVID-19… | Hon. Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge | United States District Court for the District of MaineCourt | Aug. 7, 2020 | 2020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limitWorkplace rulesOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-ME-012 | Opinion, Bayley's Campground, Inc. v. Mills, No. 20-1559 (1st Cir. Jan. 14, 2021), 985 F.3d 153Bayley's Campground, Inc. v. Mills: opinion affirming the refusal of a preliminary injunction against Maine's traveler self-quarantine… | Barron, Circuit Judge, for a panel with Selya, Circuit Judge | United States Court of Appeals for the First CircuitCourt | Jan. 14, 2021 | 2021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyTravel and quarantineQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-AL-020 | Munza v. Ivey, No. 1200003 (Ala. Mar. 19, 2021), 334 So. 3d 211Barry Munza, Larry Lewis, and Debbie Mathis v. Kay Ivey, in her official capacity as Governor; Scott Harris, in his official capacity as… | Supreme Court of Alabama (Bolin, J.) | Alabama (Supreme Court of Alabama)Court | Mar. 19, 2021 | 2021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-AL-021 | Case v. Ivey, No. 2:20-cv-777-WKW, Doc. 54 (M.D. Ala. June 1, 2021) (Memorandum and Opinion Order)Jennifer Case, et al. v. Kay Ivey, in her individual capacity and official capacity as Governor of Alabama, et al. | United States District Court, M.D. Ala. (Watkins, J.) | Alabama (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division)Court | June 1, 2021 | 2021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureGathering capFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-WA-020 | Slidewaters LLC v. Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, No. 20-35634Opinion affirming denial of injunctive relief and dismissal of claims against Proclamations 20-05 and 20-25 and L&I emergency rule WAC… | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Gould, Clifton, Bress, JJ.; opinion by Judge Clifton) | Washington (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, on appeal from E.D. Wash.)Court | July 8, 2021 | 2021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureWorkplace rulesOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OK-019 | Ho v. Tulsa Spine & Specialty Hospital, L.L.C., 2021 OK 68, 507 P.3d 673, Case No. 119,752Opinion reversing dismissal of a nurse's wrongful-discharge action: the Governor's COVID-19 emergency orders expressed established Oklahoma… | Supreme Court of Oklahoma (Kauger, J., for the Court) | OklahomaCourt | Dec. 14, 2021 | 2020 Q2 | Standing dutyHealth care ordersWorkplace rulesStanding dutyOperating condition | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-CA-019 | Published opinion: See's Candies, Inc. v. Superior Court (Ek), No. B312241 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2021), 73 Cal.App.5th 66See's Candies, Inc. v. Superior Court: a wrongful-death action alleging that an employee contracted COVID-19 at work 'because of defendants'… | California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District | CaliforniaCourt | Dec. 21, 2021 | | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-FED-073 | Secretary of Labor v. Ariana Murrell-Rosario d/b/a Liberty Tax Service, OSHRC Docket No. 21-0432, Decision and Order (June 6, 2022)Decision and Order, OSHRC Docket No. 21-0432 (Liberty Tax Service, Lynn, Massachusetts) | Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Chief Administrative Law Judge Covette Rooney | United States (Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission)Court | June 6, 2022 | 2021 Q12021 Q2 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-CA-020 | Opinion: Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc., No. S274191 (Cal. July 6, 2023), 14 Cal.5th 993Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks: employers 'allowed to continue operations during this time were subject to strict regulations designed to… | Supreme Court of California (Corrigan, J., for a unanimous court) | CaliforniaCourt | July 6, 2023 | | Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding duty | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MT-019 | Stand Up Montana v. Missoula County Public Schools, 2023 MT 240, No. DA 23-0046 (Mont. Dec. 12, 2023)Opinion affirming summary judgment for the Missoula County school districts on the substantive due process challenge to their 2021-22 mask… | Supreme Court of Montana (Gustafson, J.) | MontanaCourt | Dec. 12, 2023 | | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementSchools and child careWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-018 | Central Pastime, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 342 Or App 391 (Aug. 6, 2025) (A180094; OLCCV024): judicial review affirming a 72-day liquor-license suspension for failing to require employees and customers to wear face coverings on Dec. 2, 2020 (OHA July 24, 2020 guidance) and Mar. 27, 2021 (EO 20-66)In the Matter of the Full-On Premises Sales License Held By Central Pastime, LLC, dba Central Pastime, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and… | Oregon Court of Appeals (Shorr, P.J., with Pagan, J., and O'Connor, J.) | OregonCourt | Aug. 6, 2025 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOther | Primary source read | |