| Ex. MET-CMH-053 | Fourteenth General Order in Response to the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Public Health Emergency, No. 21MS000358Fourteenth General Order in Response to the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Public Health Emergency | Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, General Division (McIntosh, Adm. J.) | Franklin County, OhioCourt | Oct. 8, 2021 | | Gathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-FED-LANDS-SCIENCE-COURTS-018 | Press release: Court Standards and Protocols to Protect Public Health; summary of D.C. courthouse protocols (Oct. 5, 2021)Press Release: health protocols and courthouse access for in-person proceedings | United States Tax Court | United States Tax CourtCourt | Oct. 5, 2021 | | Context (guidance or announcement)Capacity limitFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesVaccination or testing | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-BNA-083 | S.B. v. Lee, No. 3:21-cv-00317-JRG-DCP (E.D. Tenn.), Memorandum Opinion and Order on the Knox County Board of Education's Amended and Restated Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. 47, filed Oct. 12, 2021)Order granting in part the motion to alter or amend: exemptions permitted under Policy C-240; injunction otherwise maintained | Hon. J. Ronnie Greer, United States District Judge | Knox County, Tennessee (E.D. Tenn.)Court | Oct. 12, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementSchools and child care | Primary source read | |
| Ex. TN-068 | S.B. v. Lee, No. 3:21-cv-00317, Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 12, 2021)Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order granting preliminary injunction: Knox County Board of Education ordered to enforce a mask mandate… | United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Greer, J.) | Tennessee (Knox County)Court | Oct. 12, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementSchools and child careCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-ORL-059 | Administrative Order No. 2020-06-13Amended Temporary Order Governing Trial Court Proceedings (access limitation of Aug. 23, 2021 lifted; face masks still required at all times… | Chief Judge Donald A. Myers, Jr. | Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida (Orange and Osceola Counties)Court | Oct. 8, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesQuarantine and isolation | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MN-055 | Order Governing the Continuing Operations of the Minnesota Judicial Branch, No. ADM20-8001 (Minn. filed Oct. 18, 2021)Order Governing the Continuing Operations of the Minnesota Judicial Branch | Minnesota Supreme Court, Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea | MinnesotaCourt | Oct. 18, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-BNA-082 | R.K. v. Lee, No. 3:21-cv-00725 (M.D. Tenn.), Memorandum Opinion and Order granting preliminary injunction (Doc. 85, filed Oct. 22, 2021)Preliminary injunction: Executive Order No. 84, as extended by Executive Order No. 89, enjoined in Williamson County pending trial | United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee | Williamson County, Tennessee (M.D. Tenn.)Court | Oct. 22, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementSchools and child care | Primary source read | |
| Ex. TN-079 | R.K. v. Lee, No. 3:21-cv-00725, Doc. 85, Memorandum Opinion (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 22, 2021)Memorandum Opinion granting preliminary injunction against enforcement of Executive Order No. 84 (Williamson County and Franklin SSD) | United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (Crenshaw, C.J.) | Tennessee (Williamson County; Franklin SSD)Court | Oct. 22, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementSchools and child careCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-ORL-045 | Administrative Order No. 2020-06-14Amended Temporary Order Governing Trial Court Proceedings (mask requirement in court facilities discontinued) | Chief Judge Donald A. Myers, Jr. | Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida (Orange and Osceola Counties)Court | Oct. 25, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. VT-063 | Amendment to Administrative Order No. 49 (promulgated November 4, 2021)Judicial emergency extended to March 1, 2022; bar exam health protocols including vaccination proof | Vermont Supreme Court (memo to the bar) | VermontCourt | Nov. 4, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesVaccination or testing | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. MET-TPA-054 | Administrative Order No. 2021-045 PA/PI-CIRElimination of Face Mask and Distancing Requirements for Court Facilities in Conformity with the Florida Supreme Court Administrative Order… | Chief Judge Anthony Rondolino | Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida (Pasco and Pinellas Counties)Court | Nov. 10, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DFW-096 | Opinion, Abbott v. Jenkins, No. 05-21-00733-CV, 665 S.W.3d 675 (Tex. App.--Dallas Nov. 22, 2021) (Nowell, J.), vacated (Tex. June 30, 2023)Fifth Court of Appeals opinion (Nowell, J.) affirming the temporary injunction against GA-38 in favor of Dallas County (Nov. 22, 2021) | Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas (Opinion by Justice Nowell) | Texas (Fifth Court of Appeals, Dallas)Court | Nov. 22, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. FED-309 | Standing Order 21-11In re: Court Operations Under the Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 | Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson | United States District Court for the District of New JerseyCourt | Dec. 29, 2021 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesVaccination or testing | Primary source read | |
| Ex. SC-043 | Disability Rights South Carolina v. McMaster, No. 21-2070, 24 F.4th 893 (4th Cir. Jan. 25, 2022)Vacating in part the D.S.C. preliminary injunction of September 28, 2021 against enforcement of Proviso 1.108 (as to the Governor and… | United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Thacker, J.) | South Carolina (federal)Court | Jan. 25, 2022 | | Face-covering requirementSchools and child care | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-CIN-027 | Press release: Expiration of Courthouse Mask Mandate (Feb. 24, 2022)Expiration of Courthouse Mask Mandate | Hamilton County Courts | Hamilton County, OhioCourt | Feb. 24, 2022 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-RIV-070 | Public Notice re Face Coverings Not Required (March 4, 2022)Public Notice re Face Coverings Not Required | Superior Court of California, County of Riverside | Superior Court of California, County of RiversideCourt | Mar. 4, 2022 | | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. DUT-FED-073 | Secretary of Labor v. Ariana Murrell-Rosario d/b/a Liberty Tax Service, OSHRC Docket No. 21-0432, Decision and Order (June 6, 2022)Decision and Order, OSHRC Docket No. 21-0432 (Liberty Tax Service, Lynn, Massachusetts) | Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Chief Administrative Law Judge Covette Rooney | United States (Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission)Court | June 6, 2022 | 2021 Q12021 Q2 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-MKE-027 | Becker v. Dane County, 2022 WI 63 (Nos. 2021AP1343 & 2021AP1382) (decided July 8, 2022)Jeffrey Becker, Andrea Klein and A Leap Above Dance, LLC v. Dane County, Janel Heinrich and Public Health of Madison & Dane County | Supreme Court of Wisconsin | Wisconsin (Dane County orders)Court | July 8, 2022 | | Face-covering requirementOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-017 | JGB Enterprises, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 325 Or App 326, 529 P3d 262 (Apr. 19, 2023) (A176066): judicial review affirming a default order suspending a Lane County saloon's liquor license for 38 days for violating EO 20-66 and OHA guidance 'that qualified as public health laws' during Extreme Risk (Jan. 4-Feb. 20, 2021)JGB Enterprises, LLC, dba Twisted River Saloon, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Respondent | Oregon Court of Appeals | OregonCourt | Apr. 19, 2023 | 2021 Q1 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limitFace-covering requirementOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MI-019 | T & V Associates, Inc. v. Director of Health and Human Services, No. 361727 (Mich. Ct. App. June 29, 2023) (for publication)Published opinion on a banquet caterer's challenge to the MDHHS Gatherings and Face Mask Order of March 19, 2021: the orders under MCL… | Michigan Court of Appeals (Boonstra, P.J., and Gadola and Yates, JJ.; opinion by Gadola, J.), on appeal from the Court of Claims, No. 21-000075-MM | MichiganCourt | June 29, 2023 | | Standing dutyCapacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-MT-019 | Stand Up Montana v. Missoula County Public Schools, 2023 MT 240, No. DA 23-0046 (Mont. Dec. 12, 2023)Opinion affirming summary judgment for the Missoula County school districts on the substantive due process challenge to their 2021-22 mask… | Supreme Court of Montana (Gustafson, J.) | MontanaCourt | Dec. 12, 2023 | | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementSchools and child careWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-016 | Along Came Trudy LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 330 Or App 295, 543 P3d 751 (Jan. 24, 2024), rev den, 372 Or 588 (July 18, 2024) (A178679; OLCC21V003): judicial review affirming cancellation of a Lane County restaurant and event venue's liquor license for three violations of EO 20-66 (indoor dining while prohibited)Along Came Trudy LLC, dba Along Came Trudy, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, Respondent | Oregon Court of Appeals (Kamins, J., with Tookey, P.J., and Egan, J.); review denied by the Oregon Supreme Court | OregonCourt | Jan. 24, 2024 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Standing dutyBusiness closureCapacity limitFace-covering requirementOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-OR-018 | Central Pastime, LLC v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission, 342 Or App 391 (Aug. 6, 2025) (A180094; OLCCV024): judicial review affirming a 72-day liquor-license suspension for failing to require employees and customers to wear face coverings on Dec. 2, 2020 (OHA July 24, 2020 guidance) and Mar. 27, 2021 (EO 20-66)In the Matter of the Full-On Premises Sales License Held By Central Pastime, LLC, dba Central Pastime, Petitioner, v. Oregon Liquor and… | Oregon Court of Appeals (Shorr, P.J., with Pagan, J., and O'Connor, J.) | OregonCourt | Aug. 6, 2025 | 2020 Q42021 Q1 | Standing dutyFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. FED-287 | General Order No. 44 (entrance protocols; COVID-19)General Order 44: Entrance Protocols (Elbert P. Tuttle Courthouse) | United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Atlanta)Court | | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Confirmed from a secondary source | |