| Ex. DUT-OR-019 | Shahtout v. Emco Garbage Co., 298 Or 598, 695 P2d 897 (Feb. 12, 1985) (SC S30764): the standing Oregon rule on governmental safety requirements as the standard of care (negligence per se where the requirement is enacted by the legislature or promulgated under delegated authority for general public safety; a workplace safety rule protecting a class that includes the plaintiff is admissible and 'may' be taken into account by the trier of fact in deciding due care)Shahtout, Petitioner on Review, v. Emco Garbage Company, Inc. et al, Respondents on Review | Supreme Court of Oregon | OregonCourt | Feb. 12, 1985 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-SC-020 | Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se… | Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina) | South CarolinaCourt | Oct. 14, 1991 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. NM-009 | Supreme Court Order No. 20-8500-007In the Matter of the Stay of Writs of Restitution Issued Under the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act During the COVID-19 Public Health… | Supreme Court of New Mexico | New MexicoCourt | Mar. 24, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Courts and public officesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MO-063 | Orders of April 1, 2020 (extension of the suspension of in-person proceedings) and May 4, 2020 (Operational Directives for Easing COVID-19 Restrictions on In-Person Proceedings)Extension of the statewide suspension; phased operational directives with gateway criteria, distancing and masks | Supreme Court of Missouri | Missouri (all State courts)Court | Apr. 1, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q1 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-068 | California Rules of Court, Appendix I: Emergency Rules Related to COVID-19 (Emergency rules 1-13, adopted April 6, 2020, as amended)Statewide emergency rules: Emergency rule 1 barred issuance of unlawful-detainer summonses and defaults except to protect public health and… | Judicial Council of California | Judicial Council of California (statewide rulemaking body of the California courts)Court | Apr. 6, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Courts and public officesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. CA-040 | Emergency Rules of Court (adopted April 6, 2020) as recited in the Judicial Council's report of March 3, 2022Judicial Council report: Judicial Branch Administration: Sunset of Emergency Rules (reciting the adoption, amendment and sunset history of… | Judicial Council of California (Rules Committee report to the Council) | CaliforniaCourt | Mar. 3, 2022 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Courts and public officesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-045 | Commissioner's Bulletin # B-0019-20, Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Suspension of a provision of Health and Safety Code and a DWC rule related to workers' compensationBulletin implementing the Governor's suspension of the 10-day exposure-testing requirement for emergency responders' workers' compensation… | Cassie Brown, Commissioner of Workers' Compensation, Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation | Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation (statewide)Court | Apr. 10, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Health care ordersOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-KS-020 | Kelly v. Legislative Coordinating Council, No. 122,765 (Kan. Apr. 11, 2020) (original action in quo warranto; quo warranto granted in part)Laura Kelly, Governor of the State of Kansas, v. Legislative Coordinating Council, et al. | Supreme Court of Kansas (per curiam) | KansasCourt | Apr. 11, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyGathering capEvents and venuesStanding dutyOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-PA-020 | Judicial opinion (majority opinion on an emergency application for extraordinary relief)Friends of Danny DeVito, Kathy Gregory, B&J Laundry, LLC, Blueberry Hill Public Golf Course & Lounge, and Caledonia Land Co. v. Governor Tom… | Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (Donohue, J., for the Court; Saylor, C.J., Baer, Todd, Dougherty, Wecht and Mundy, JJ.) | PennsylvaniaCourt | Apr. 13, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyStay-at-homeBusiness closureOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-TRADE-BOARDS-019 | Order for Temporary Amendments to Bar Admission Procedures During COVID-19 Outbreak (emergency diploma privilege with 360 hours of supervised practice)In re: Matter of Emergency Modifications to Utah Supreme Court Rules of Professional Practice, Rules Governing Admission to the Utah State… | Utah Supreme Court | Utah; Supreme Court of Utah (bar admission)Court | Apr. 21, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Gathering capCourts and public officesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. VT-050 | Eighth Amendment to Administrative Order No. 49 (promulgated April 21, 2020)Masks required in Judiciary buildings; remote hearings expanded; parent-child contact emergencies | Vermont Supreme Court (memo to the bar) | VermontCourt | Apr. 21, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Telework mandateFace-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Confirmed from a secondary source | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-COURTS-047 | Administrative Order No. 5: Use of Face Masks/Coverings in Court FacilitiesFace coverings required for court staff, lawyers, litigants, jurors, contractors, vendors and all visitors in common and public areas of… | Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., Supreme Court of Delaware | Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (statewide)Court | Apr. 30, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DET-044 | Announcement: Effective immediately, a mask is required for entry into the courthouseMask required for courthouse entry; only parties to a case (and minor children) admitted | 36th District Court (Detroit) | City of Detroit, Michigan (36th District Court)Court | May 1, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. SC-050 | Supreme Court Order 2020-05-01-01 (May 1, 2020)Attorney supervision of real estate closings by video conference during the emergency | Supreme Court of South Carolina | South CarolinaCourt | May 1, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Courts and public officesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-RIV-034 | General Order 2020-21 Re: Face Coverings and Physical DistancingGeneral Order 2020-21 (filed May 6, 2020) | Presiding Judge John W. Vineyard | Superior Court of California, County of RiversideCourt | May 6, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-SFO-062 | General Order Regarding Face Coverings Required in CourthousesGeneral Order requiring all persons entering the courthouses to wear a face covering in all public areas and shared work spaces | Presiding Judge, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara | Superior Court of California, County of Santa ClaraCourt | May 12, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. WI-007 | Wisconsin Legislature v. Palm, 2020 WI 42, No. 2020AP765-OA, ¶¶ 3-4Emergency Order 28 is a rule requiring emergency rulemaking and is unenforceable; § 252.25 requires rulemaking before criminal penalties… | Wisconsin Supreme Court (Roggensack, C.J.) | WisconsinCourt | May 13, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Other | Primary source read | |
| Ex. NM-017 | Supreme Court Order No. 20-8500-017In the Matter of the Use of Protective Face Coverings in New Mexico Courts During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency | Supreme Court of New Mexico | New MexicoCourt | May 15, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-DCM-042 | Mandatory Face Covering Order, In re All Persons Entering Fairfax Courthouse During the COVID-19 PandemicMandatory Face Covering Order (May 18, 2020) | Circuit Court of Fairfax County | Fairfax County, VirginiaCourt | May 18, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. DUT-CT-007 | Amato v. Elicker, No. 3:20-cv-464 (MPS), ECF No. 32, Ruling on Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (D. Conn. May 19, 2020), reported at 460 F. Supp. 3d 202Amato v. Elicker: ruling denying a New Haven restaurant's motion to enjoin Executive Orders 7, 7D, 7G and 7N | United States District Court, D. Conn. (Shea, J.) | Connecticut (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut)Court | May 19, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Standing dutyBusiness closureGathering capOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. AGY-ST-TRADE-BOARDS-040 | Misc. Docket No. 20-9069, Final Approval of the Rules Governing the Supervised Practice of Law by Qualified Law Students and Qualified Unlicensed Law School Graduates in Texas (preliminarily adopted Apr. 29, 2020 in Misc. Docket No. 20-9060 with the bar-exam postponement)Final Approval of the Rules Governing the Supervised Practice of Law by Qualified Law Students and Qualified Unlicensed Law School Graduates… | Supreme Court of Texas (Hecht, C.J.) | Texas; Supreme Court of Texas (bar admission)Court | May 20, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Courts and public officesOther | Primary source read | |
| Ex. MET-MSP-055 | Administrative Order Pertaining to Face Masks or Face Coverings in District Court Courtrooms During COVID-19 EmergencyOrder re face coverings in courtrooms | Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial District | Hennepin County (Fourth Judicial District)Court | May 20, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. FL-067 | Administrative Order No. AOSC20-32In re: COVID-19 Public Health and Safety Precautions for Phase 2 | Chief Justice Charles T. Canady, Supreme Court of Florida | Florida (all State courts)Court | May 21, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Gathering capFace-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |
| Ex. FED-302 | Standing Order 20-13In re: Use of Face Coverings/Masks Due to COVID-19 | Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson | United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Newark, Trenton, Camden)Court | May 22, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public offices | Primary source read | |
| Ex. WI-027 | Order, In re the Matter of the Extension of Orders and Interim Rule Concerning Continuation of Jury Trials, Suspension of Statutory Deadlines for Non-Criminal Jury Trials, and Remote Hearings During the COVID-19 PandemicOrder extending the in-person suspension and jury-trial continuance for each circuit court until a chief-judge-approved operational plan… | Wisconsin Supreme Court | WisconsinCourt | May 22, 2020 | 2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2 | Face-covering requirementCourts and public officesWorkplace rules | Primary source read | |