Skip to content
The COVID Project

The Record

The Orders Library

13,511 instruments indexed by The COVID Project: the orders of the fifty States and the District, forty metros, the federal layer and the agencies; the standing duties; the organizers' notices; the legal authorities. Filter by kind, State, limitation type, quarter and more; open the exhibit; download what you find.

Results

The COVID Projectcovidproject.com/library
173 instruments · showing 151–173
Download
ExhibitInstrumentIssuerJurisdictionIssuedQuartersLimitationsGradeFile
Ex. AGY-ST-LABOR-WORKPLACE-032Nevada OSHA Enforcement Process during COVID-19 Pandemic (July 23, 2020)OSHA Enforcement Process: unannounced observations of face-covering and distancing compliance; follow-up visits; citationsDivision of Industrial Relations, Nevada OSHANevada; Division of Industrial Relations / Nevada OSHASector regulatorJuly 23, 20202020 Q32020 Q4Face-covering requirementWorkplace rulesPrimary source read
Ex. AGY-ST-LABOR-WORKPLACE-034Updated Nevada OSHA Enforcement Process during COVID-19 Pandemic (Nov. 2, 2020)Updated enforcement process: changes in counties with elevated disease transmissionDivision of Industrial Relations, Nevada OSHANevada; Division of Industrial Relations / Nevada OSHASector regulatorNov. 2, 20202020 Q42021 Q1Face-covering requirementWorkplace rulesPrimary source read
Ex. AZ-017Executive Order 2020-34Building on COVID-19 Successes: Resuming additional business operations for barbers, cosmetologists and dine-in restaurantsGovernor Douglas A. DuceyArizonaStateMay 4, 20202020 Q22020 Q3Business closureCapacity limitFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesPrimary source read
Ex. AZ-020Executive Order 2020-40Containing the Spread of COVID-19: Continuing Arizona Mitigation EffortsGovernor Douglas A. DuceyArizonaStateJune 17, 20202020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q1Face-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOtherPrimary source read
Ex. AZ-036Executive Order 2021-05Next Phase of COVID-19 Mitigation: Lifting Occupancy Limits Implemented Due to COVID-19Governor Douglas A. DuceyArizonaStateMar. 5, 20212021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Capacity limitFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesPrimary source read
Ex. AZ-037Executive Order 2021-06New Phase of COVID-19 Mitigation: Business Guidelines Transition From Requirements To RecommendationsGovernor Douglas A. DuceyArizonaStateMar. 25, 20212021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Face-covering requirementEvents and venuesOtherPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-AZ-013Requirements document issued under executive orderRequirements for Businesses: Pursuant to Executive Order 2020-40 Containing the Spread of COVID-19Office of Governor Douglas A. Ducey with the Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizonaStateJune 17, 20202020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q1Standing dutyTelework mandateCapacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesOperating conditionPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-CA-010Statute: Labor Code, Division 5, Part 1, Chapter 4 (sections 6423-6436), Violations and PenaltiesLabor Code sections 6423-6436: misdemeanor for knowing or negligent violation of a standard or order deemed serious, for repeated violations…California Legislature (codified text published by the Legislative Counsel)CaliforniaStateSept. 28, 20262020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-KS-014K.S.A. 60-5502, Definitions, including (j) 'public health directives'60-5502. DefinitionsKansas Legislature (K.S.A., Revisor of Statutes)KansasStateJune 9, 20202020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyOperating conditionPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-MT-015Mont. Code Ann. 27-1-1601 (SB 65 sec. 1)Definitions ('public health guidance'; 'person'; 'premises'; 'personal protective equipment')Montana Legislature (67th), Senate Bill 65, Ch. 2, L. 2021MontanaStateFeb. 10, 20212021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-NE-019Legislative Bill 139 (2021), the COVID-19 Liability Act (secs. 1-4) and the Health Care Crisis Protocol Act (secs. 5-9)A bill for an act relating to public health and welfare; to adopt the COVID-19 Liability Act; to adopt the Health Care Crisis Protocol Act…Nebraska Legislature (One Hundred Seventh Legislature, First Session); approved by Governor Pete RickettsNebraskaStateMay 25, 20212021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyStanding dutyOperating conditionPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-NJ-010N.J.S.A. 34:6A-33, Responsibilities of employers (PEOSHA general duty)Responsibilities of employersNew Jersey Legislature (L.1983, c. 516, s. 9; amended L.1995, c. 186, s. 5)New JerseyState2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-OK-01376 O.S. 111 (SB 1946, 2020)Liability (civil actions claiming injury from exposure or potential exposure to COVID-19)Oklahoma Legislature (Senate Bill 1946, 2d Sess., 57th Leg.; signed by Governor Stitt)OklahomaStateMay 21, 20202020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyOperating conditionPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-SC-01329 U.S.C. § 654 (OSH Act § 5), Duties of employers and employeesDuties of employers and employees (general duty clause)Congress of the United StatesUnited StatesFederalDec. 29, 19702020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-UT-012Utah Code section 34A-6-307Civil and criminal penaltiesUtah Legislature (Utah Code Title 34A, Chapter 6; version effective May 9, 2017)UtahStateMay 9, 20172020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-VA-005Va. Code section 40.1-51.1, Duties of employersDuties of employersGeneral Assembly of Virginia (Code of Virginia, Title 40.1, Labor and Employment, Chapter 3, Protection of Employees)VirginiaState2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyWorkplace rulesStanding dutyPrimary source read
Ex. MD-094MDH Notice - Face Covering Recommendation (Effective July 1, 2021)Notice - Face Covering Recommendation (Effective July 1, 2021)Dennis R. Schrader, Secretary of HealthMarylandSector regulatorJune 30, 20212021 Q3Face-covering requirementOtherPrimary source read
Ex. MET-ORL-010Emergency Executive Order No. 2020-51Regarding COVID-19: Reopening Orange County and Requiring Social Distancing and Face CoveringsMayor Jerry L. Demings, as Director of Emergency ManagementOrange County, FloridaCountyDec. 4, 20202020 Q42021 Q12021 Q2Capacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesPrimary source read
Ex. MET-PDX-016Announcement that the County's local mask requirement will be lifted March 12, 2022, with the County's own chronology of mask requirements from April 2020 (post-period exhibit establishing the duration of the August 2021 county mandate)After nearly two years of mandates, County follows state, will lift mask requirement March 12Multnomah County (Chair Deborah Kafoury; Health Officer Dr. Jennifer Vines)Multnomah County, OregonCountyMar. 1, 2022Face-covering requirementConfirmed from a secondary source
Ex. NV-016Declaration of Emergency Directive 018 (Phase One Reopening Plan), May 7, 2020, ss. 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 25Phase One reopening: retail, dealers and dining at 50 percent, salons by appointment, closures continued, gatherings of ten, employer mask…Governor Steve SisolakNevadaStateMay 7, 20202020 Q2Business closureTelework mandateCapacity limitGathering capFace-covering requirementCurfew and hoursWorkplace rulesPrimary source read
Ex. SEC-20-034Emergency rule WSR 21-03-012, chapter 246-358 WACTemporary worker housing: COVID-19 requirements (third emergency rule)Department of Health (with Department of Labor and Industries)WashingtonStateJan. 8, 20212021 Q12021 Q2Gathering capFace-covering requirementWorkplace rulesQuarantine and isolationPrimary source read
Ex. VA-012Executive Order 63 and Order of Public Health Emergency FiveRequirement to Wear Face Covering While Inside BuildingsGovernor Ralph S. Northam and State Health Commissioner M. Norman OliverVirginiaStateMay 26, 20202020 Q22020 Q32020 Q4Face-covering requirementWorkplace rulesPrimary source read
Ex. DUT-SC-020Whitlaw v. Kroger Co., 306 S.C. 51, 410 S.E.2d 251 (S.C. 1991) (heard Jan. 7, 1991; decided Oct. 14, 1991)Whether a private cause of action for damages may be instituted under S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-40 and 61-9-410; the test for negligence per se…Supreme Court of South Carolina (per curiam; certified question under Supreme Court Rule 46 from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina)South CarolinaCourtOct. 14, 19912020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3Standing dutyStanding dutyOtherPrimary source read