Skip to content
The COVID Project
  1. Library
  2. Standing duties: Washington
  3. DUT-WA-013

Ex. DUT-WA-013 Standing duty Primary source read

RCW 5.40.050

Breach of duty—Evidence of negligence—Negligence per se

Washington State Legislature · Washington (State)

The COVID Project

The record

Jurisdiction
Washington
Level
State
Authority
Tort Reform Act of 1986, chapter 5.40 RCW
Effective
standing
End
standing (read as 2021-09-30)
In force
Standing (a statutory duty; in force throughout the six quarters)
Quarters
2020 Q22020 Q32020 Q42021 Q12021 Q22021 Q3
Limitation types
Standing dutyOther
Addressees
  • persons generally; employers; owners or persons in control of premises (as defendants in negligence actions)
Character
liability shield condition
Collection
Standing duties: Washington DUT-WA

Operative words

A breach of a duty imposed by statute, ordinance, or administrative rule shall not be considered negligence per se, but may be considered by the trier of fact as evidence of negligence; however, any breach of duty... relating to:... (3)... other precaution against the spread of disease, as required under RCW 70.54.350... shall be considered negligence per se.

Penalty

Civil liability in negligence; breach of the enumerated duties is negligence per se

What it required

Washington enacted no COVID-19 liability shield; this standing statute made the breach of any statutory, ordinance or administrative-rule duty (every proclamation condition, every L&I rule, every Secretary of Health order and every local health order) admissible evidence of negligence in any suit by an employee, customer or visitor, so that compliance with the health directives was the legal standard of care.

Retrieval note

Recorded under character liability_shield_condition because it performs, for Washington, the standard-of-care function that the shield statutes' compliance conditions perform elsewhere. No Washington shield statute or proclamation was located (see liability_shield_finding).